Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lesho, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Roth, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lesho, E. P.
Right arrow Articles by Roth, B. J.
(Chest. 1997;112:1291-1292.)
© 1997 American College of Chest Physicians

Is pH Paper an Acceptable, Low-Cost Alternative to the Blood Gas Analyzer for Determining Pleural Fluid pH?

Emil P. Lesho DO1 and Bernard J. Roth MD1

1 From the Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Wash.

Background: Our laboratory uses pH paper rather than a blood gas analyzer to measure pleural fluid pH to decrease cost and avoid analyzer malfunction due to viscous fluids.

Methods: To compare these two methods of determining pleural fluid pH, 42 patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic thoracentesis had two 1-mL aliquots of pleural fluid anaerobically collected in a heparinized syringe and placed on ice. pH measurements were made using litmus paper (pHydron Vivid 6-8 brand litmus paper; MicroEssential Labs; Brooklyn, NY) and the model 995-Hb blood gas analyzer (AVL Instruments; Roswell, GA) within 1 h of collection. Agreement analysis was performed in three ways: on the entire group; in subcategories of complicated or uncomplicated parapneumonic effusions (<7.1, 7.1 to 7.3, >7.3); and in subcategories of poor prognosis or better prognosis malignant effusions(<7.3, >7.3).

Results: pH measured with pH paper was significantly more variable (SD=0.55, coefficient of variation [CV]=7.5%) than was pH measured with the blood gas analyzer (SD=0.11, CV=1.5%). There was no significant correlation between values obtained with the two techniques (r=minus0.26, SD of the differences=0.59). Using the pH subcategories, there was 72% discordance in classification between litmus paper and arterial blood gas (ABG) determinations for patients with parapneumonic effusions. In patients with malignant effusions, there was 30% discordance. The pH values obtained by the ABG analyzer predicted tube thoracostomy 72% of the time, whereas the pH values obtained using pH paper were consistent only 36% of the time.

Conclusion: Determination of pleural fluid pH using pH paper is unreliable and should not be considered an acceptable alternative to the blood gas analyzer. There is no need to determine pH on purulent samples. Hospital laboratories will be more likely to allow the use of the ABG analyzer on fluids other than blood if clinicians keep this in mind.

Key Words: blood gas analyzer • pH paper • pleural fluid pH

Submitted on January 22, 1997
Accepted on April 1, 1997




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
A Medford and N Maskell
Pleural effusion
Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2005; 81(961): 702 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
C W H Davies, F V Gleeson, and R J O Davies
BTS guidelines for the management of pleural infection
Thorax, May 1, 2003; 58(90002): ii18 - 28.
[Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. L. Colice, A. Curtis, J. Deslauriers, J. Heffner, R. Light, B. Littenberg, S. Sahn, R. A. Weinstein, and R. D. Yusen
Medical and Surgical Treatment of Parapneumonic Effusions : An Evidence-Based Guideline
Chest, October 1, 2000; 118(4): 1158 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. S. Shapiro and E. J. Mark
Case 14-2000- A 60-Year-Old Farm Worker with Bilateral Pneumonia
N. Engl. J. Med., May 11, 2000; 342(19): 1430 - 1438.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
B. D. Sarodia, L. S. Goldstein, D. M. Laskowski, A. C. Mehta, and A. C. Arroliga
Does Pleural Fluid pH Change Significantly at Room Temperature During the First Hour Following Thoracentesis?
Chest, April 1, 2000; 117(4): 1043 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. J. Castro, G. Diaz, E. Perez-Rodriguez, E. Prieto, and R. D. Yusen
Modification of Pleural Fluid pH by Local Anesthesia
Chest, August 1, 1999; 116(2): 399 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American College of Chest Physicians.