Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Granton, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenstein, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Granton, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lichtenstein, S.
(Chest. 1998;113:1347-1355.)
© 1998 American College of Chest Physicians

Assessment of Three Methods to Reduce the Influence of Mathematical Coupling on Oxygen Consumption and Delivery Relationships

John T. Granton MD, FCCP1; Keith R. Walley MD1; P. Terry Phang MD1; James A. Russell MD1; and Samuel Lichtenstein MD1

1 From the Division of Cardiac Surgery, and Program of Critical Care, Pulmonary Research Laboratory, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Study objectives: To determine if oxygen consumption/oxygen delivery (VO2/DO2) relationships derived using calorimetry (which are not influenced by shared measurement error) agreed with those obtained using the pulmonary artery (PA) catheter alone. To evaluate three strategies to reduce the influence of shared measurement error to determine if agreement between the two methods could be improved.

Methods: Twenty-seven patients were studied following coronary artery bypass surgery. Calorimetric VO2, six thermodilution cardiac outputs (COs), and arterial and mixed venous oxygen content measurements were made at baseline and were repeated 30 min following dobutamine administrations of 3 µg/kg/min and 5 µg/kg/min.

Results: Dobutamine produced a dose-dependent increase in DO2, from 378±65 mL/min/m2 to 446±78 mL/min/m2 (p<0.01) and in both PA catheter and calorimetric-derived VO2, from 104±18 mL/min/M2 to 114±22 mL/min/m2 (p<0.05) and from 117±15 mL/min/m2 to 126±19 mL/min/m2 (p<0.01), respectively. Agreement was poor (bias=12%, SD=21%) between the calorimetric and PA catheter methods of determining VO2/DO2 slope. When three CO measurements were used to calculate VO2, and three separate CO measurements were used to calculate DO2, the level of agreement between the two methods improved (bias=2%, SD=15%). Increasing the number of COs resulted in a similar improvement in the level of agreement between the two methods. Weighting the slope to the observed change in DO2 was the best method to improve the level of agreement (bias=2%, SD=6% for three COs).

Conclusions: To reduce the influence of shared measurement error, the best strategy to improve the measurement of VO2/DO2slope is to maximize the change in DO2 (optimally over 100 mL/min/m2).

Key Words: calorimetry • cardiac output • oxygen consumption • oxygen delivery • pathologic supply dependence

Submitted on January 3, 1997
Accepted on November 3, 1997




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. S. Walsh
Recent advances in gas exchange measurement in intensive care patients
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2003; 91(1): 120 - 131.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
Y.-K. Tu, M.S. Gilthorpe, and G.S. Griffiths
Is Reduction of Pocket Probing Depth Correlated with the Baseline Value or is it "Mathematical Coupling"?
J. Dent. Res., October 1, 2002; 81(10): 722 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians.