|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
1 From the Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Lenexa, KS.
2 From the Division of New York University Medical Center, New York, NY and Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Lenexa, KS.
David M. Rapoport, MD, Department of Medicine, New York University Medical Center, 550 First Ave, New York, NY 10016
Objectives: To examine the relative temporal appearance of flow limitation and snoring during continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration, compare their sensitivity as indicators of airway obstruction, and assess their relative utility as feedback variables for automatic titration of CPAP.
Design: Retrospective review of data.
Setting: University teaching hospital.
Patients: Fifty-three patients diagnosed as having obstructive sleep apnea or upper airway resistance syndrome undergoing CPAP titration.
Measurements and results: We used a prototype automatic CPAP device that adjusts pressure in response to apnea, snoring, and/or flow limitation. The present study takes advantage of the frequent automatic decreases in pressure from a therapeutic level, as well as any technicianinitiated decreases in pressure. We tabulated, for each pressure decrease of >0.4 cm H2O, the occurrences of snoring alone, flow limitation alone, or simultaneous appearance of both. Of 2,177 automatic pressure decreases, 64% resulted in flow limitation alone, 8% in snoring alone, and 22% in the simultaneous occurrence of both. Overall, 86% of decreases resulted in flow limitation alone or were simultaneous with snoring, whereas 30% of decreases resulted in snoring alone or were simultaneous with flow limitation. In 10 of 35 patients, snoring alone occurred in >10% of the pressure decreases. In all but 5 of 133 manual pressure decreases, flow limitation developed at or above the pressure at which snoring developed.
Conclusions: While detection of snoring occasionally provided additional information, overall flow limitation was the earliest indicator of obstruction during decreases in CPAP.
Key Words: auto-CPAP CPAP flow limitation obstructive sleep apnea snoring UARS upper airway
Submitted on December 11, 1997
Accepted on March 16, 1998
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. Marrone, A. Salvaggio, S. Romano, and G. Insalaco Automatic Titration and Calculation by Predictive Equations for the Determination of Therapeutic Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Chest, March 1, 2008; 133(3): 670 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Lofaso, G. Desmarais, K. Leroux, V. Zalc, R. Fodil, D. Isabey, and B. Louis Bench evaluation of flow limitation detection by automated continuous positive airway pressure devices. Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 343 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Abdenbi, B. Chambille, and P. Escourrou Bench testing of auto-adjusting positive airway pressure devices Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2004; 24(4): 649 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Noseda, C. Kempenaers, M. Kerkhofs, S. Braun, P. Linkowski, and E. Jann Constant vs Auto-Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Patients With Sleep Apnea Hypopnea Syndrome and a High Variability in Pressure Requirement Chest, July 1, 2004; 126(1): 31 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. O'Donnell, L. Allan, P. Atkinson, and A. R. Schwartz The Effect of Upper Airway Obstruction and Arousal on Peripheral Arterial Tonometry in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2002; 166(7): 965 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |