Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosman, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Retter, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosman, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Retter, K.
(Chest. 1998;114:793-795.)
© 1998 American College of Chest Physicians

Quality of History Taking in Patients With Aortic Dissection

Howard S. Rosman MD, FCCP1; Sarine Patel MD1; Steven Borzak MD1; Gaetano Paone MD, FCCP1; and Kenneth Retter MD1

1 From the Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit

Howard S. Rosman, MD, FCCP, 2799 W Grand Blvd, K-14, Detroit, MI 48202

Study objectives: Aortic dissection generally is an acute catastrophe. Rapid diagnosis is critical. We hypothesized that the quality of history taking contributes to the accuracy of diagnosis in patients with dissection.

Design: Retrospective chart review of 83 patients, whose diagnosis of aortic dissection was confirmed by autopsy, surgery, CT scan, echocardiogram, or angiogram. The quality of the initial history was reviewed using predetermined criteria. The physicians' initial clinical impressions were recorded.

Results: The examining physician correctly suspected aortic dissection after the initial clinical evaluation in 54 of 83 patients (65%). Only 33 of 78 patients with symptoms (42%) were asked about the quality, location, and onset of their pain, the three descriptors identified a priori as important. In 19 patients (24%), only zero or one descriptor was recorded. When all three questions were asked, dissection was suspected in 30 of 33 patients (91%); when zero, one, or two questions were asked, dissection was suspected in 22 of 45 patients (49%).

Conclusion: Despite important advances in diagnostic imaging, accurate diagnosis of aortic dissection requires an accurate history. In our series, the quality of initial history was associated with the accuracy of the initial clinical impression in patients with aortic dissection.

Key Words: aortic dissection • chest pain • clinical history • accuracy

Submitted on August 28, 1997
Accepted on February 19, 1998




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Saf Health CareHome page
K G Shojania, E C Burton, K M McDonald, and L Goldman
Overestimation of clinical diagnostic performance caused by low necropsy rates
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 408 - 413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
M. Klompas
Does This Patient Have an Acute Thoracic Aortic Dissection?
JAMA, May 1, 2002; 287(17): 2262 - 2272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
S. Schena, A. Agnino, and L. d. L. T. Schinosa
Role of Chest Pain in Aortic Dissection : Is It Enough for a Predictive Diagnosis?
Chest, February 1, 1999; 115(2): 605 - 605.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
H. S. Rosman, S. Borzak, and S. Patel
Response
Chest, February 1, 1999; 115(2): 606 - 606.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Detection of Aortic Dissection
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, November 1, 1998; 1998(1101): 14 - 14.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Chest Physicians.