|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
1 From the WVU PET Center, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV.
2 From the Department of Radiology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV.
3 From the Department of Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV.
Naresh C. Gupta, MD, WVU PET Center, G201A HSC-South, Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV 26506, e-mail: ngupta{at}wvuhscl.hsc.wvu.edu
Purpose: This study was done to evaluate the diagnostic utility of dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging in patients with suspected malignant pulmonary lesions. We wanted to test the hypothesis that the rate of FDG uptake (FDG influx constant values) would differentiate malignant from benign lung or mediastinal lesions.
Materials and methods: We performed segmental dynamic PET imaging studies following administration of FDG in 19 patients with indeterminate pulmonary lesions based on chest radiograph and/or CT scans. Patlak analysis was done to compute Ki (FDG influx constant) values and compared with FDG standardized uptake values (SUVs) and histology.
Results: FDG Ki values (mean ± SD) were significantly greater (p < 0.01) in all 12 malignant lesions (0.029 ± 0.02) as compared with 7 benign lesions (0.0024 ± 0.0011) with good correlation to the SUV values. Distinct time activity curve patterns were identified in malignant and benign lesions with continued uptake in malignant lesions.
Conclusion: Dynamic PET-FDG imaging accurately differentiates malignant from benign pulmonary lesions. In certain cases with equivocal findings on visual analysis and SUV values, dynamic imaging may be further helpful in differentiating benign and malignant lesions.
Key Words: metabolism PET pulmonary
Submitted on July 29, 1997
Accepted on April 2, 1998
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Nie, Q. Li, F. Li, Y. Pu, D. Appelbaum, and K. Doi Integrating PET and CT Information to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy for Lung Nodules: A Semiautomatic Computer-Aided Method J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1075 - 1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nomori, K. Watanabe, T. Ohtsuka, T. Naruke, K. Suemasu, and K. Uno Visual and Semiquantitative Analyses for F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose PET Scanning in Pulmonary Nodules 1 cm to 3 cm in Size Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 984 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Metser 18F-FDG PET in Evaluating Patients Treated for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Can We Predict Prognosis? J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1428 - 1430. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Strauss, A. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, and U. Haberkorn Shortened PET Data Acquisition Protocol for the Quantification of 18F-FDG Kinetics J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2003; 44(12): 1933 - 1939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Gould, G. D. Sanders, P. G. Barnett, C. E. Rydzak, C. C. Maclean, M. B. McClellan, and D. K. Owens Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Management Strategies for Patients with Solitary Pulmonary Nodules Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 724 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Demura, T. Tsuchida, T. Ishizaki, S. Mizuno, Y. Totani, S. Ameshima, I. Miyamori, M. Sasaki, and Y. Yonekura 18F-FDG Accumulation with PET for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lesions in the Thorax J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2003; 44(4): 540 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Marom, S. Sarvis, J. E. Herndon, and E. F. Patz Jr T1 Lung Cancers: Sensitivity of Diagnosis with Fluorodeoxyglucose PET Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 453 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Higashi, T. Saga, Y. Nakamoto, T. Ishimori, M. H. Mamede, M. Wada, R. Doi, R. Hosotani, M. Imamura, and J. Konishi Relationship Between Retention Index in Dual-Phase 18F-FDG PET, and Hexokinase-II and Glucose Transporter-1 Expression in Pancreatic Cancer J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2002; 43(2): 173 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.F. Vansteenkiste Imaging in lung cancer: positron emission tomography scan Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 49S - 60s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lee, J. M. Aronchick, and A. Alavi Accuracy of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography for the Evaluation of Malignancy in Patients Presenting With New Lung Abnormalities : A Retrospective Review Chest, December 1, 2001; 120(6): 1791 - 1797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Gungor, I Engel-Bicik, G Eich, U V Willi, D Nadal, J P Hossle, R A Seger, and H C Steinert Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of whole body positron emission tomography using fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in children with chronic granulomatous disease Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 2001; 85(4): 341 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.F. Vansteenkiste and S.G. Stroobants The role of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in respiratory oncology Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 802 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Gould, C. C. Maclean, W. G. Kuschner, C. E. Rydzak, and D. K. Owens Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Nodules and Mass Lesions: A Meta-analysis JAMA, February 21, 2001; 285(7): 914 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |