Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lerner, B. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lerner, B. H.
(Chest. 1999;115:236-241.)
© 1999 American College of Chest Physicians

Catching Patients: Tuberculosis and Detention in the 1990s*

Barron H. Lerner, MD, PhD

* From the Center for the Study of Society & Medicine, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY.

The resurgence of tuberculosis (TB) in the early 1990s, including multidrug-resistant strains, led health officials to recommend the use of involuntary detention for persistently nonadherent patients. Using a series of recently published articles on the subject, this paper offers some opinions on how detention programs have balanced protection of the public's health with patients' civil liberties. Detained persons are more likely than other TB patients to come from socially disadvantaged groups. Health departments have generally used coercion appropriately, detaining patients as a last resort and providing them with due process. Yet health officials still retain great authority to bypass "least restrictive alternatives" in certain cases and to detain noninfectious patients for months or years. Misbehavior within institutions may inappropriately be used as a marker of future nonadherence with medications. As rates of TB and attention to the disease again decline, forcible confinement of sick patients should be reserved for those persons who truly threaten the public's health.

Key Words: communicable disease control/legislation and jurisprudence • homelessness • medical ethics • patient compliance • public health administration • quarantine • socioeconomic factors • tuberculosis/prevention and control




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
H. S. Chung and J. H. Lee
Bronchoscopic Assessment of the Evolution of Endobronchial Tuberculosis
Chest, February 1, 2000; 117(2): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. H. Lerner, D. J. Rothman, M. J. Tracy, M. R. Gasner, T. R. Frieden, and P. I. Fujiwara
Legal Action to Ensure Treatment of Tuberculosis
N. Engl. J. Med., July 8, 1999; 341(2): 130 - 131.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Chest Physicians.