Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aggarwal, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Jindal, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aggarwal, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Jindal, S. K.
(Chest. 1999;115:557-562.)
© 1999 American College of Chest Physicians

Interpreting Spirometric Data*

Impact of Substitution of Arm Span for Standing Height in Adults From North India

Ashutosh N. Aggarwal, MD, DM; Dheeraj Gupta, MD, DM, FCCP and Surinder K. Jindal, MD, FCCP

* From the Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Abstract

Study objective: To evaluate if direct substitution of arm span for height during interpretation of spirometry data leads to any significant statistical or clinical differences in Indian adults, and to compare this method with the use of height estimated indirectly from arm span.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Respiratory laboratory of a tertiary referral hospital in North India.

Participants: Two hundred twenty-eight subjects referred for spirometry.

Measurements and results: Standing height and arm span were measured for all subjects. Spirometry measurements included FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, peak expiratory flow, and maximal midexpiratory flow. Predicted values for each parameter were calculated separately for height, arm span, and height estimated from fixed height:arm span ratio. Results were classified into normal, obstructive, and restrictive defects for each height, arm span, and estimated height measurement, and any abnormality was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. Arm span exceeded height in 182 (79.82%) subjects. Thirty-seven (16.2%) and 32 (14.0%) results were classified or categorized incorrectly when arm span and estimated height were substituted respectively, for actual height, with a kappa estimate of agreement 0.779 and 0.808, respectively; 17.4% and 11.0% normal results were classified, respectively, as restrictive defects using arm span and estimated height. Limits of agreement, which were almost equally wide for both sets of data, were more than the permissible intraindividual variability for FVC and FEV1.

Conclusions: The substitution of arm span for height introduces statistically significant changes in spirometry results. Use of height estimated from arm span using fixed ratio also leads to misclassification of data, though less than that caused by use of arm span alone. Height estimated from arm span can be substituted for actual height in patients in whom height cannot be measured reliably. Where racial/ethnic norms for height and arm span correlation are not available, arm span is a reasonable surrogate for standing height.

Key Words: arm span • height • spirometry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R. Pellegrino, G. Viegi, V. Brusasco, R. O. Crapo, F. Burgos, R. Casaburi, A. Coates, C. P. M. van der Grinten, P. Gustafsson, J. Hankinson, et al.
Interpretative strategies for lung function tests
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2005; 26(5): 948 - 968.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. R. Miller, R. Crapo, J. Hankinson, V. Brusasco, F. Burgos, R. Casaburi, A. Coates, P. Enright, C. P. M v. d. Grinten, P. Gustafsson, et al.
General considerations for lung function testing
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2005; 26(1): 153 - 161.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. Teramoto, T. Matsuse, Y. Ouchi, A. N. Aggarwal, D. Gupta, and S. K. Jindal
Substitution of Arm Span for Standing Height Is Important for the Assessment of Predicted Value of Lung Volumes in Elderly People With Osteoporosis
Chest, December 1, 1999; 116(6): 1837 - 1838.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Chest Physicians.