Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smeltzer, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lavietes, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smeltzer, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lavietes, M. H.
(Chest. 1999;115:1546-1552.)
© 1999 American College of Chest Physicians

Reliability of Maximal Respiratory Pressures in Multiple Sclerosis*

Suzanne C. Smeltzer , RN, EdD and Marc H. Lavietes , MD

* From the College of Nursing (Dr. Smeltzer), Villanova University, Villanova, PA; and the Department of Medicine (Dr. Lavietes), University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ. Supported by National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health grant R15 NR02763–01.

Objective: To assess the reliability of maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) and maximal expiratory pressure (PEmax) in subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy control subjects by identifying the number of testing sessions and the number of measurements needed in a single testing session to obtain consistent, reproducible results.

Design: A descriptive, comparative design with repeated measures was used.

Setting: Four sets of 10 PImax and 10 PEmax measurements were obtained over a 4-week period from MS subjects in their homes. The same measurements were obtained from healthy control subjects in a private setting.

Subjects: Seventy-two MS patients and 61 healthy control subjects participated in the study.

Measurement: PImax and PEmax values were obtained by using previously published methods.

Results: Mean PEmax and PImax values for MS patients differed over the first three of the four testing sessions. By contrast, mean PEmax and PImax values for healthy control subjects differed only when the first session values were compared with values from the last three sessions. For MS patients, PEmax and PImax increased between the first and 10th trial during the first testing session, but not during the subsequent three sessions.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that several practice sessions should be provided in order to obtain reliable PEmax and PImax values in persons with MS. At least one practice session should be provided for healthy control subjects before identifying a baseline.

Key Words: maximal respiratory pressures • multiple sclerosis • respiratory muscle strength




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
F K Mutluay, H N Gurses, and S Saip
Effects of multiple sclerosis on respiratory functions
Clinical Rehabilitation, April 1, 2005; 19(4): 426 - 432.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Chest Physicians.