Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fireman, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fireman, E.
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, Y.
(Chest. 1999;115:1720-1728.)
© 1999 American College of Chest Physicians

Assessment of Hazardous Dust Exposure by BAL and Induced Sputum*

Elizabeth Fireman , PhD; Joel Greif , MD; Yehuda Schwarz , MD; Avraham Man , MD; Eliazer Ganor , PhD; Yosef Ribak , MD, MPH and Yehuda Lerman , MD, MPH

* From the Institute of Pulmonary and Allergic Diseases (Drs. Fireman, Greif, Schwarz, and Man), the Ministry of the Environment (Dr. Ganor), and the Occupational Health and Rehabilitation Institute, Ra'anana (Drs. Ribak and Lerman), the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Objectives: BAL, an important tool in assessing occupational lung diseases, is unsuitable for screening programs, exposure evaluation, or monitoring hazardous dust because it is an invasive technique. The results of induced sputum (IS) analysis were compared with BAL and evaluated as a possible alternative.

Methods: We compared BAL with IS analysis of 5 workers exposed to asbestos and 14 exposed to silica and hard metals. Pulmonary function tests and BAL were performed by conventional methods. IS induction was performed after a 20-min inhalation of 3.5% saline solution with an ultrasonic nebulizer. Giemsa-stained cytopreparations were differentially counted. T-lymphocyte subsets were analyzed by flow-activated cell sorter, and messenger RNA (mRNA) was transcribed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Mineralogic particles were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and polarizing light microscopy and quantified by an analyzer.

Results: The percentage of neutrophils was significantly lower in BAL fluid than in IS specimens, whereas no differences were found in the percentage of lymphocytes and subsets profile. Asbestos fibers were found in BAL but not in IS samples from workers exposed to asbestos. Polarizing particles were found in both samples. Similar mineral elements were found in qualitative analysis by scanning electron microscopy. Quantitative studies showed similar size distribution with a small shift toward larger particles in sputum; mRNA showed the same cytokine profile.

Conclusions: A comparison of BAL and IS specimens in the evaluation of the study population yielded similar quantitative and qualitative results. Further research is needed to evaluate the hypothesis that IS, being a noninvasive technique, may be useful in monitoring exposed workers.

Key Words: BAL • induced sputum • occupational lung diseases




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
N. Kulkarni, N. Pierse, L. Rushton, and J. Grigg
Carbon in airway macrophages and lung function in children.
N. Engl. J. Med., July 6, 2006; 355(1): 21 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
K. T. Palmer, R. McNeill-Love, J. R. Poole, D. Coggon, A. J. Frew, C. H. Linaker, and J. K. Shute
Inflammatory responses to the occupational inhalation of metal fume
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 366 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
Leader of the Working Group:, I.D. Pavord, Members of the Working Group:, P.J. Sterk, F.E. Hargreave, J.C. Kips, M.D. Inman, R. Louis, M.M.M. Pizzichini, E.H. Bel, et al.
Clinical applications of assessment of airway inflammation using induced sputum
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2002; 20(37_suppl): 40S - 43s.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Chest Physicians.