HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ferguson, M. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ferguson, M. K.

Preoperative Assessment of Pulmonary Risk^*

^* From the Department of Surgery, the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Correspondence to: Mark K. Ferguson, MD, FCCP, 5841 S Maryland Ave MC5035, Chicago, IL 60637; e-mail: mferguso{at}surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu

Study objectives: A summary of current modalities for and the utility of preoperative assessment of pulmonary risk.

Design: Review of recent literature published in the English language.

Setting: Not applicable.

Patients or participants: Patients who undergo elective cardiothoracic or abdominal operations.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Measurements and results: Postoperative pulmonary complications occur after 25 to 50% of major surgical procedures. The accuracy of the preoperative assessment of the risk of such complications is only fair. The routine assessment for all preoperative patients includes age, general physiologic status, and the nature of the planned operation. Specific tests such as measurement of spirometric values and diffusing capacity are indicated routinely only for patients who are candidates for major lung resection or esophagectomy.

Conclusions: Pulmonary complications are an important form of postoperative morbidity after major cardiothoracic and abdominal operations. The appropriate preoperative assessment of the risk of such complications is well defined for lung resection and esophagectomy operations, but it requires refinement for general surgical and cardiovascular operations.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Birim, A.P.W.M. Maat, A.P. Kappetein, J.P. van Meerbeeck, R.A.M. Damhuis, and A.J.J.C. Bogers Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients with operated primary non-small cell lung cancer Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 30 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Yende and R. Wunderink Validity of Scoring Systems to Predict Risk of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery* Chest, July 1, 2002; 122(1): 239 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Overend, C. M. Anderson, S. D. Lucy, C. Bhatia, B. I. Jonsson, and C. Timmermans The Effect of Incentive Spirometry on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications : A Systematic Review Chest, September 1, 2001; 120(3): 971 - 978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Beccaria, A. Corsico, P. Fulgoni, M. C. Zoia, L. Casali, G. Orlandoni, and I. Cerveri Lung Cancer Resection : The Prediction of Postsurgical Outcomes Should Include Long-term Functional Results Chest, July 1, 2001; 120(1): 37 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]