|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
12 Years of Age*
* From the Department of Pediatrics (Dr. Furukawa), University of Washington, School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Oklahoma Allergy and Asthma Clinic (Dr. Atkinson), Oklahoma City, OK; Allergy, Asthma and Arthritis Associates, P.C. (Dr. Forster), Doylestown, PA; and Rhône-Poulenc Rorer (Ms. Nazzario, Messrs. Simpson and Uryniak, and Dr. Casty), Collegeville, PA.
Correspondence to: Frank E. Casty, MD, FCCP, 324 Glad Way, Collegeville, PA 19426; e-mail: frank.casty{at}rp-rorer.com
Study objectives: This multicenter, randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study compared the efficacy
and safety of the hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) formulation of cromolyn
sodium metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with the chlorofluorocarbon
(CFC) formulation in asthmatic patients
12 years old over a 12-week
period.
Design: Stable asthmatics using only currently marketed cromolyn sodium and as-needed inhaled ß2-agonists were randomly assigned to treatment with HFA cromolyn sodium, CFC cromolyn sodium, or placebo, administered as two inhalations (2 mg) qid for 12 weeks. Prior to randomization, all patients were required to meet minimum symptom and/or pulmonary function test criteria after discontinuation of cromolyn sodium. Efficacy was assessed by changes in daily symptom scores, albuterol use, peak expiratory flow, pulmonary function measurements, and overall opinions of effectiveness.
Results: A total of 280 patients in 29 centers were randomly assigned to treatment with HFA cromolyn sodium (n = 94), CFC cromolyn sodium (n = 91), or placebo (n = 95). Patients treated with the HFA formulation of cromolyn sodium demonstrated a 28 to 33% improvement over placebo for all symptom scores (p < 0.05) and a 35% improvement over placebo in the use of albuterol MDI (p < 0.05). The patients' opinions of overall effectiveness favored HFA cromolyn sodium (p = 0.011) and CFC cromolyn sodium (p = 0.006) over placebo. The investigators' opinions indicated a statistically significant difference favoring CFC cromolyn sodium compared with both placebo (p < 0.001) and HFA cromolyn sodium (p = 0.042). No statistically significant differences existed among groups in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events.
Conclusion: The HFA formulation of cromolyn
sodium MDI is a well-tolerated and effective treatment for asthma
patients
12 years old. The safety and efficacy profile of the HFA
formulation is comparable to that of the CFC
formulation.
Key Words: chlorofluorocarbon cromolyn sodium hydrofluoroalkane metered-dose inhaler Montreal Protocol ozone
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |