Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dales, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Llewellyn-Thomas, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dales, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Llewellyn-Thomas, H.
(Chest. 1999;116:792-800.)
© 1999 American College of Chest Physicians

Intubation and Mechanical Ventilation for COPD*

Development of an Instrument To Elicit Patient Preferences

Robert E. Dales, MD, MSc; Annette O'Connor, RN, PhD; Paul Hebert, MD, MSc, FCCP; Karen Sullivan; Douglas McKim, MD and Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, RN, PhD

* From the Departments of Medicine (Drs. Dales, Hebert, and McKim, and Ms. Sullivan) and Nursing (Dr. O'Connor), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; and the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and The Clinical Epidemiology Unit (Dr. Llewellyn-Thomas), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Correspondence to: Robert E. Dales, MD, MSc, Ottawa General Hospital, LM17, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada

Background: Whether to simply provide palliative care or to intubate and use mechanical ventilation (MV) in a patient with severe COPD in acute respiratory failure is a difficult decision. The outcome of MV cannot be accurately predicted. Some patients cannot be weaned from the ventilator; those who are weaned often return to chronic severe respiratory disability. It is important that patients participate in this decision, but assistance is required. To address these issues, we developed and pilot-tested an aid to assist patients with MV decisions.

Methods: A scenario-based decision aid was developed consisting of an audiocassette and a booklet describing intubation and MV and its possible outcomes. We used a probability tradeoff technique to elicit the patients' preferences and a decisional conflict scale to evaluate satisfaction.

Results: With the assistance of the decision aid, all patients (10 men and 10 women) reached a decision. Two men and all 10 women declined MV. Mean decisional conflict was low (2.2 of a possible 5; SD, 0.9). At 1 year, only two patients (11%) had changed their decision. The agreement between physicians and patients was 65%; between next-of-kin and patients, there was uniform disagreement.

Conclusion: With the decision aid, stable decisions were made with satisfaction and confidence. Proxy decisions were incongruent, especially when made by family members. The strong gender effect should be further investigated. We suggest that the COPD decision aid be further tested in a community clinical setting.

Key Words: advanced directives • COPD • decision making • mechanical ventilation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Statement on Home Care for Patients with Respiratory Disorders
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2005; 171(12): 1443 - 1464.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
A K Simonds
Ethics and decision making in end stage lung disease
Thorax, March 1, 2003; 58(3): 272 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. E. Hahn
Advance Directives and Patient-Physician Communication
JAMA, January 1, 2003; 289(1): 96 - 96.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
A C Davidson
The pulmonary physician in critical care * 11: Critical care management of respiratory failure resulting from COPD
Thorax, December 1, 2002; 57(12): 1079 - 1084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
T. R. Fried, E. H. Bradley, and V. R. Towle
Assessment of Patient Preferences: Integrating Treatments and Outcomes
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., November 1, 2002; 57(6): S348 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. H Sloan, L. A M Evans, and M. C Howes
Cancer isn't the only malignant disease
BMJ, April 27, 2002; 324(7344): 1035 - 1035.
[Full Text]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. Goldblatt
A messy necessary end: Health care proxies need our support
Neurology, January 23, 2001; 56(2): 148 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Chest Physicians.