Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moss, M.
Right arrow Articles by Clardy, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moss, M.
Right arrow Articles by Clardy, N.
(Chest. 1999;116:1019-1024.)
© 1999 American College of Chest Physicians

Differences in the Response Times of Pages Originating From the ICU*

Marc Moss, MD; Terence K. Trow, MD, FCCP and Nancy Clardy, RN

* From the Department of Medicine (Dr. Moss), Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Crawford Long Hospital of Emory University (Dr. Moss and Ms. Clardy) and the Carlyle Fraser Heart Center (Dr. Moss), Atlanta, GA; and the Department of Medicine (Dr. Trow), Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Danbury Hospital, Danbury, CT.

Correspondence to: Marc Moss, MD, Crawford Long Hospital of Emory University, Suite 5310, 550 Peachtree St, NE, Atlanta, GA; e-mail: marc moss{at}emory.orgmoss@emory.org

Study objectives: To determine whether the type of paging system causes significant differences in the response time by physicians to their pages in an ICU setting.

Design and setting: Prospective cohort study performed in the ICU of two university-affiliated hospitals. All pages were classified by several different variables, including the type of paging system: direct paging if a nurse or hospital operator could directly place the page, or indirect paging if a nurse or hospital operator was required to contact the physician's office or a private answering service who would then independently contact the physician. The main outcome measure was physicians' response time, in minutes, to pages originating from the ICU.

Results: During a 100-day period, 402 pages were sent and answered by 166 different physicians (87 attending physicians and 79 housestaff/physician assistants). The median response time for all pages was 3 min with a 25 to 75% quartile of 1 to 8 min. Twenty-five percent of the pages placed through an indirect system were associated with a response time of >= 29 min. In a multivariate model with the response time dichotomized at >= 15 min ("slow") or < 15 min ("adequate"), pages placed through an indirect system were answered significantly more slowly than pages placed through a direct system (p < 0.001; odds ratio, 4.36; 95% confidence interval, 2.05 to 9.29). Pages answered in an adequate amount of time were also associated with a significantly higher degree of overall nursing satisfaction with the care delivered by the physician in response to the specific page when compared with pages answered in a "slow" manner (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Physicians who use an indirect paging system are significantly slower in their response to ICU pages when compared with physicians who utilize a direct paging system. These results may lead to improvements in paging systems used by physicians who care for patients in an ICU setting.

Key Words: hospital communication systems • ICU • ICU organization • hospital personnel • hospital medical staff







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Chest Physicians.