|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Pulmonary Disease/Critical Care Service, Department of Medicine (LTC Morris, MAJ Deal, MAJ Grbach, and LTC Morgan), and Speech Pathology, Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Service (Mr. Bean), Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX.
Correspondence to: LTC Michael J. Morris, Pulmonary/Critical Care Service (MCHE-MDP), Brooke Army Medical Center, 3851 Roger Brooke Dr, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6200; e-mail: Michael.Morris{at}cen.amedd.army.mil
Study objectives: To evaluate patients for vocal cord dysfunction (VCD) in a military population presenting with symptoms of exertional dyspnea.
Design: Cross-sectional, controlled study.
Setting: Pulmonary disease clinic at an army tertiary care center.
Patients: Forty military patients with complaints of exertional dyspnea and 12 military asymptomatic control subjects.
Intervention: Patients underwent direct visualization of vocal cords with flexible laryngoscopy before and after exercise to evaluate for presence of inspiratory vocal cord adduction.
Measurements and results: Complete evaluation for all patients consisted of spirometry with flow-volume loops, lung volumes, diffusing capacity, and maximum voluntary ventilation at rest; chest radiograph; methacholine bronchoprovocation testing; and a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test with expiratory gas analysis. Fifteen percent of patients studied prospectively were found to have VCD, whereas all control subjects were negative for VCD. There was minimal difference in pulmonary function testing between VCD-positive and VCD-negative patients, whereas control subjects had higher spirometric values. Twenty percent of VCD-positive patients had abnormal flow-volume loops compared with 14% of patients without VCD, but after methacholine, 60% of VCD-positive patients developed abnormal flow-volume loops. In the VCD-positive group, 60% had a positive methacholine response, but there was less decrease in FEV1/FVC ratio compared with either VCD-negative patients or control subjects.
Conclusions: Paradoxical inspiratory vocal cord closure is a frequent occurrence in patients with symptoms of exertional dyspnea and should be strongly considered in their evaluation.
Key Words: exercise testing exertional dyspnea flow-volume loops laryngoscopy methacholine pulmonary function testing vocal cord dysfunction
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Mikita and J. Parker High levels of medical utilization by ambulatory patients with vocal cord dysfunction as compared to age- and gender-matched asthmatics. Chest, April 1, 2006; 129(4): 905 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Strek Difficult asthma. Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2006; 3(1): 116 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K E Fallon Upper airway obstruction masquerading as exercise induced bronchospasm in an elite road cyclist Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2004; 38(4): e9 - e9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. W. Rundell and B. A. Spiering Inspiratory Stridor in Elite Athletes Chest, February 1, 2003; 123(2): 468 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Perkins and M. J. Morris Vocal Cord Dysfunction Induced by Methacholine Challenge Testing Chest, December 1, 2002; 122(6): 1988 - 1993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |