|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||

*
From the Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (Drs. Joynt and Gomersall) and the Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging (Dr. Kew, Ms. Leung, and Mr. Liu), Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Currently at St. Marys Hospital, London, UK.
Correspondence to: Gavin M. Joynt, MBBCh, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin N.T., Hong Kong, PRC; e-mail: gavinmjoynt{at}cuhk.edu.hk
Study objectives: To determine the frequency of and potential risk factors for catheter-related deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in critically ill adult patients.
Design: Prospective, controlled, observational cohort study.
Setting: A mixed medical and surgical ICU in a university hospital.
Patients: All adult patients undergoing femoral vein catheterization.
Interventions: None.
Measurements: ICU diagnosis, underlying disease, demographic data, type of catheter, complications during cannulation, use of anticoagulants, coagulation status, medications infused, and duration of catheterization were recorded. Compression and duplex Doppler ultrasound studies of both femoral veins were performed prior to insertion, at 12 h after insertion, and daily until catheter removal. Follow-up investigation was performed at 24 h and 1 week after removal.
Results: Of 140 cases entered into the study, 124 were evaluated. Fourteen patients developed iliofemoral vein DVTs. Two were clinically obvious. Twelve (9.6%) were line related (uncannulated leg normal) and two (1.6%) occurred only in the uncannulated leg (p = 0.011; relative risk, 6.0; confidence interval, 1.5 to 23.5). Line-related DVT can occur any time from the day after insertion to 1 week after removal. The incidence of catheter-related DVT was unrelated to number of insertion attempts, arterial puncture or hematoma, duration of catheterization, coagulation status, or type of infused medications. No other predisposing or protective factors were identified. Three of the 12 patients with catheter-related DVT died. In no patient was clinical pulmonary embolus suspected.
Conclusion: Although the femoral route is convenient and has potential advantages, the use of femoral lines increases the risk of iliofemoral DVT. Catheter-related DVT may occur as soon as 1 day after cannulation and is usually asymptomatic. This increased risk should be carefully considered when the femoral route of cannulation is chosen.
Key Words: catheterization central venous complications critically ill femoral vein thrombosis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Khouli, J. Shapiro, V. P. Pham, A. Arfaei, O. Esan, R. Jean, and P. Homel Efficacy of Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis in the Medical Intensive Care Unit J Intensive Care Med, December 1, 2006; 21(6): 352 - 358. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R J Wall, E W Ely, T A Elasy, R S Dittus, J Foss, K S Wilkerson, and T Speroff Using real time process measurements to reduce catheter related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 295 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Desmond and S. Teece Thrombotic complications of a femoral central venous catheter Emerg. Med. J., November 1, 2004; 21(6): 714 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Coopersmith, J. E. Zack, M. R. Ward, C. S. Sona, M. E. Schallom, S. J. Everett, W. Y. Huey, T. M. Garrison, J. McDonald, T. G. Buchman, et al. The Impact of Bedside Behavior on Catheter-Related Bacteremia in the Intensive Care Unit Arch Surg, February 1, 2004; 139(2): 131 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Cox, S. S. Carson, and A. K. Biddle Cost-effectiveness of Ultrasound in Preventing Femoral Venous Catheter-associated Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2003; 168(12): 1481 - 1487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Geerts and R. Selby Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in the ICU Chest, December 1, 2003; 124(6_suppl): 357S - 363S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. W. Klerk, S. M. Smorenburg, and H. R. Buller Thrombosis Prophylaxis in Patient Populations With a Central Venous Catheter: A Systematic Review Arch Intern Med, September 8, 2003; 163(16): 1913 - 1921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. P. O'Grady, M. Alexander, E. P. Dellinger, J. L. Gerberding, S. O. Heard, D. G. Maki, H. Masur, R. D. McCormick, L. A. Mermel, M. L. Pearson, et al. Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections Pediatrics, November 1, 2002; 110(5): e51 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Murai Are Femoral Broviac Catheters Effective and Safe?* : A Prospective Comparison of Femoral and Jugular Venous Broviac Catheters in Newborn Infants Chest, May 1, 2002; 121(5): 1527 - 1530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Merrer, B. De Jonghe, F. Golliot, J.-Y. Lefrant, B. Raffy, E. Barre, J.-P. Rigaud, D. Casciani, B. Misset, C. Bosquet, et al. Complications of Femoral and Subclavian Venous Catheterization in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, August 8, 2001; 286(6): 700 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |