|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College
Correspondence to: Michael G. Pearson, MA, FRCP, Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians, London, UK; e-mail: Michael.Pearson{at}rcplondon.ac.uk
Guidelines for a variety of diseases have now been produced. However, implementation of guidelines requires that the medical profession is willing to conform to patterns of diagnostic and treatment behavior set down by others. This may not happen in practice. Early experience in the United Kingdom was gained with the introduction of guidelines for the management of asthma. For a number of years, there have been improvements in practice, but deficiencies still exist. When the introduction of guidelines for the management of COPD was planned, a new approach was taken with a consortium of the British Thoracic Society, pharmaceutical companies, and medical equipment companies being formed to promote their use. Early studies show that COPD care starts from an even lower baseline than asthma; there is poor understanding of objective diagnosis of COPD in both primary and secondary care.
Key Words: clinical guidelines COPD spirometry
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. L. Fuhlbrigge, S. T. Weiss, K. M. Kuntz, A. D. Paltiel, and for the CAMP Research Group Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second Percentage Improves the Classification of Severity Among Children With Asthma Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): e347 - e355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Timmermans and A. Mauck The Promises And Pitfalls Of Evidence-Based Medicine Health Aff., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 18 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |