HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jay, G. D. Articles by Steele, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jay, G. D. Articles by Steele, D.

Analysis of Physician Ability in the Measurement of Pulsus Paradoxus by Sphygmomanometry^*

^* From the Departments of Medicine (Drs. Jay and Davis) and Pediatrics (Drs. Mansell and Steele), Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI; the Center for Statistical Sciences (Mr. Chen), Brown University, Providence, RI; and the Department of Molecular Medicine (Dr. Onuma), Tohoku University, Japan.

Correspondence to: Gregory D. Jay, MD, PhD, Department of Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, 593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02903; e-mail: gregory_jay_MD{at}brown.edu

Context: Measurement of pulsus paradoxus (PP) is one of several measures previously advocated in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute asthma management guidelines: a pulsus of > 12 mm Hg warranted hospital admission. It is one of only a few measures that is not effort dependent and therefore important in the evaluation of patients with asthma.

Objective: Determination of physician accuracy in measuring PP.

Design: A model of induced PP in a trained healthy subject without respiratory disease was constructed with a fixed inspiratory resistance with measurement of inspiratory air pressure and beat-to-beat BP noninvasively.

Setting: Laboratory.

Participants: Attending physicians from emergency medicine and critical care disciplines who served as consecutive examiners of the trained reference subject generating known PP.

Interventions: A total of 19 attending physicians were assessed for ability in measuring PP by sphygmomanometry and by palpation. The reference subject generated 4° of PP sequentially, with each examiner blinded to the value of negative inspiratory pressure and PP. Examiners first assessed PP qualitatively by palpation, followed by its measurement within 2 min.

Main outcome measure: Proximity of physician-measured PP (PPm) to true PP (PPt).

Results: At inspiratory pressures of - 10, - 15, - 20, and - 25 mm Hg, PPt was 13.7, 16.2, 19.1, and 20.7 mm Hg, respectively (F = 14.8, p < 0.0001; analysis of variance [ANOVA]). At the same pressures, PPm was 13.1, 17.5, 17.7, and 18.0 mm Hg (p > 0.10; ANOVA). Linear regression of PPm against PPt for each examiner revealed a slope (SE) of 0.53 (0.23), and not a 1:1 relationship.

Conclusions: Past and present guidelines do not account for the challenges in measuring PP, especially in tachypneic patients. Sphygmomanometric determination of PP should be augmented by new aids developed through technological innovation.

Key Words: asthma • BP • physical examination • pulsus paradoxus

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Rayner, F. Trespalacios, J. Machan, V. Potluri, G. Brown, L. M. Quattrucci, and G. D. Jay Continuous noninvasive measurement of pulsus paradoxus complements medical decision making in assessment of acute asthma severity. Chest, September 1, 2006; 130(3): 754 - 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]