Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bock, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sagy, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bock, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Sagy, M.
(Chest. 2000;118:468-472.)
© 2000 American College of Chest Physicians

Reduction in Tracheal Lumen Due to Endotracheal Intubation and Its Calculated Clinical Significance*

Kevin R. Bock, MD; Peter Silver, MD; Maya Rom and Mayer Sagy, MD, FCCP

* From the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Schneider Children’s Hospital, Hyde Park, NY.

Correspondence to: Kevin R. Bock, MD, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Schneider Children’s Hospital, Hyde Park, NY 11040; e-mail: krbcmgb{at}massmed.org

Background: The flow in the human trachea is turbulent. Thus, the tracheal resistance (R) and the pressure gradient ({Delta}P) required to maintain a given flow across the trachea is inversely related to its radius raised to the fifth power. If the caliber reduction ratio (X) after endotracheal intubation is calculated as X = radius of the endotracheal tube (rETT)/radius of the trachea (rT), then {Delta}P and/or R will be increased by (1/X)5.

Study objectives: To measure the actual ratio between rETT and rT following endotracheal intubation of pediatric patients with respiratory failure and to calculate the resulting increase in the tracheal R and {Delta}P for a given inspiratory flow rate.

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Pediatric ICU in a tertiary-care teaching children’s medical center.

Patient enrollment: Twenty consecutive pediatric patients (mean [± SD] age, 6.4 ± 7.2 years) whose tracheas had been intubated for various causes of respiratory failure, and who had received a CT scan, were included in our study. All patients received an endotracheal tube the size of which was derived from the following formula: (age in years/4) + 4.

Measurements and main results: rT and rETT were measured from CT scan sections at and around the level of the thoracic inlet, and the average values were used to calculate X. These values ranged from 0.33 to 0.65 (mean, 0.55 ± 0.8). The factor (1/X)5 was calculated for each patient and then was multiplied by the known normal value for tracheal R for adolescents and adults (0.07 cm H2O/L/s) to obtain the value of R resulting from the artificial airway, (1/X)5 x 0.07. Our results showed that tracheal R increased due to caliber reduction of the trachea after endotracheal intubation by 33.9 ± 52.5-fold (range, 8.6- to 255.5-fold). In order to maintain an inspiratory flow of 1 L/s, the value of P for the intubated trachea would increase from 0.07 cm H2O to a mean of 2.4 ± 3.7 cm H2O (range, 0.6 to 18 cm H2O). In two of our patients, the rT/rETT ratios were < 0.5 (0.33 and 0.44, respectively); this translated into a more significant increase in the calculated {Delta}Ps, 18 and 4.2 cm H2O, respectively.

Conclusions: The common value of X due to endotracheal intubation is between 0.5 and 0.6, which in and of itself results in an increase in R across the intubated trachea up to 32-fold. The calculated increase in P as a result of this is between 2 and 3 cm H2O for adolescents or young adults. The addition of pressure support of at least 3 cm H2O during spontaneous ventilation via an endotracheal tube, which is common practice in pediatric critical care, should alleviate any respiratory distress emanating from the increased R. However, a value for X < 0.5, which was found in 10% of our patients (2 of 20 patients), results in a much higher calculated increase in the pressure gradient and, therefore, a higher level of pressure support is required to overcome this increase.

Key Words: airway resistance • endotracheal intubation • mechanical ventilator • trachea




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. G. Randolph, D. Wypij, S. T. Venkataraman, J. H. Hanson, R. G. Gedeit, K. L. Meert, P. M. Luckett, P. Forbes, M. Lilley, J. Thompson, et al.
Effect of Mechanical Ventilator Weaning Protocols on Respiratory Outcomes in Infants and Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, November 27, 2002; 288(20): 2561 - 2568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Chest Physicians.