Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, J. P.
(Chest. 2000;118:65S-69S.)
© 2000 American College of Chest Physicians

Guideline Implementation in the Department of Defense*

John P. Mitchell, MD, FCCP

* From Travis Air Force Base, CA.

Correspondence to: Lt. Col. John P. Mitchell, USAF, MC, MD, FCCP, 60MDOS/SGOMP, 101 Bodin Circle, Suite 1C508, Travis AFB, CA 94535; e-mail: john.mitchell{at}60mdg.travis.af.mil

To improve the effectiveness of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), four other components of implementation are necessary. Together, they impressively optimize the process and outcomes of health care, and reduce undesirable variation of care. Aside from CPGs, the four components help make up a successful, long-term, facility-wide, comprehensive disease-management program. First, executive clinical and administrative leaders need to create the expectation and reveal hands-on commitment. Second, work-simplification tools are needed to accomplish the tasks more effectively and to encourage a path of least resistance. Third, useful, accurate metrics are needed to provide feedback for patients and health-care providers who need the most assistance. These metrics must be easily obtained, disseminated in near-real time, patient-specific, anonymous to others, and penalty free. Fourth, and most important, with nonmonetary compensation, this review addresses the question, "What’s in it for all the passionate people who assist in the delivery of health care?"

Key Words: clinical practice guideline • condition management • disease management program




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
B J Smith, K Dalziel, H J McElroy, R E Ruffin, P A Frith, K A McCaul, and F Cheok
Barriers to success for an evidence-based guideline for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease, July 1, 2005; 2(3): 121 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
S. Timmermans and A. Mauck
The Promises And Pitfalls Of Evidence-Based Medicine
Health Aff., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 18 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Chest Physicians.