Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graeter, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Schäfers, H.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graeter, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Schäfers, H.-J.
(Chest. 2000;118:1271-1277.)
© 2000 American College of Chest Physicians

Comparison of Aortic Valve Gradient During Exercise After Aortic Valve Reconstruction*

Thomas P. Graeter, MD; Michael Kindermann, MD; Roland Fries, MD; Frank Langer, MD and Hans-Joachim Schäfers, MD, FCCP

* From the Departments of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Drs. Graeter, Langer, and Schäfers) and Cardiology (Drs. Kindermann and Fries), University Hospitals, Hamburg, Germany.

Correspondence to: Thomas P. Graeter, MD, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospitals, 66421 Hamburg/Saar, Germany; e-mail: chtgrae{at}rz.uni-sb.de

Purpose: Aortic valve preservation is a promising alternative to conventional composite replacement of aortic valve and ascending aorta. This approach may have a physiologic benefit compared with valve replacement similar to that seen in mitral valve reconstruction. We investigated aortic valve gradients at rest and during exercise in patients who had undergone valve-preserving aortic replacement and compared them with composite replacement of valve and aorta.

Methods: Four groups were studied: nine patients underwent composite valve replacement (group A: valve diameter, 23 to 27 mm), eight patients underwent remodeling of the aortic root (group B), and another nine patients had reimplantation of the aortic valve (group C). Healthy volunteers were studied as a control group (group D). Using continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography, all patients were examined on a bicycle ergometer for aortic valve gradients (0 to 75 W).

Results: There were no differences among the groups with respect to age, body surface, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, fractional shortening, or left ventricular mass. Maximum resting gradients were significantly elevated in group A compared with groups B, C, and D (group A: 21.3 ± 7.1 mm Hg; group B: 9.0 ± 4.5 mm Hg; group C: 8.6 ± 3.7 mm Hg; group D: 4.9 ± 1.6 mm Hg; p < 0.05). At 75 W, group A exhibited significantly higher gradients than all other groups (group A: 31.3 ± 7.5 mm Hg; group B: 13.9 ± 6.6 mm Hg; group C: 12.8 ± 3.5 mm Hg; group D: 9.2 ± 1.9 mm Hg; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference among the other groups. Both valve-preserving groups had only insignificantly higher gradients than the control group.

Conclusion: Our data strongly support the suggestion that preserving the aortic valve restores nearly normal hemodynamic function of the aortic valve. Long-term observations will have to prove the clinical relevance of restoring physiologic aortic valve hemodynamics.

Key Words: aortic valve • exercise • gradients • reimplantation • remodeling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. M. Albes, U. A. Stock, and M. Hartrumpf
Restitution of the Aortic Valve: What is New, What is Proven, and What is Obsolete?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1540 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Langer, D. Aicher, A. Kissinger, O. Wendler, H. Lausberg, R. Fries, and H.-J. Schafers
Aortic Valve Repair Using a Differentiated Surgical Strategy
Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-67 - II-73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H.-J. Schafers, D. Aicher, and F. Langer
Correction of leaflet prolapse in valve-preserving aortic replacement: pushing the limits?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2002; 74(5): S1762 - 1764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Chest Physicians.