Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guyatt, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guyatt, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Goldstein, R. S.
(Chest. 2000;118:1303-1308.)
© 2000 American College of Chest Physicians

Appropriateness of Domiciliary Oxygen Delivery*

Gordon H. Guyatt, MD; Douglas A. McKim, MD, FCCP; Peggy Austin; Robert Bryan; Joan Norgren; Bruce Weaver, MSc and Roger S. Goldstein, MD, FCCP

* From the Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr. Guyatt and Ms. Austin) and Medicine (Mr. Weaver), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; the Department of Medicine (Dr. McKim and Ms. Norgren), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario; and the Department of Medicine (Dr. Goldstein and Mr. Bryan), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to: Roger S. Goldstein, MD, FCCP, Division of Respiratory Medicine, West Park Hospital, 82 Buttonwood Ave, Toronto, Ontario M6M 2J5, Canada;

Objective: Almost every country in the developed world has a domiciliary oxygen program. Whether recipients meet program criteria has not been rigorously studied.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Participants: Two hundred thirty-seven patients receiving domiciliary oxygen in the Ontario Ministry of Health Home Oxygen Program (HOP).

Methods: A respiratory therapist visited the patients’ homes and administered questionnaires, obtained resting arterial blood gas measurements, and conducted a standardized home exercise test while monitoring oxygen saturation using an oximeter.

Measures of outcome: We evaluated the extent to which patients met HOP criteria that are based on the inclusion criteria of randomized trials showing the life-prolonging effects of domiciliary oxygen. We also assessed the extent to which the patients’ oxygen prescription was consistent with the results of rest and exercise testing.

Results: Ninety-six of 237 participants (40.5%; 95% confidence interval, 34.3 to 46.8) did not meet criteria for home oxygen. Patients aged <= 70 years were more likely to meet criteria (71 of 105 patients; 67.9%) than those > 70 years old (70 of 132 patients; 53.0%). The proportion of patients meeting criteria was similar whether the referring physician was a specialist (71 of 112 patients; 62.5%) or a primary-care physician (69 of 123 patients; 56.1%). A very important health benefit from oxygen was identified among 82% of those who met criteria and 88% of those who did not. Patients received higher flow rates than our criteria suggested were appropriate. Agreement between the independently assessed oxygen prescription at rest and the patients’ report of oxygen use was extremely poor (chance-corrected agreement [{kappa}], 0.17), as was agreement concerning optimal exercise flow rates ({kappa}, 0.26).

Conclusions: Current procedures for administration and reimbursement of home oxygen result in a large proportion of recipients not meeting criteria, as well as the prescription of excessive oxygen flow rates. These results are likely to apply to many jurisdictions and suggest a large potential for more efficient resource allocation.

Key Words: audit • home assessment • long-term oxygen




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
Y Lacasse, J LaForge, and F Maltais
Got a match? Home oxygen therapy in current smokers
Thorax, May 1, 2006; 61(5): 374 - 375.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
Y. Lacasse and F. Maltais
From the authors
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2005; 26(4): 747 - 747.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
D Gorecka
Liquid oxygen, is it the gold standard?
Chronic Respiratory Disease, October 1, 2005; 2(4): 181 - 182.
[PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
G. H. Guyatt, M. Nonoyama, C. Lacchetti, R. Goeree, D. McKim, D. Heels-Ansdell, and R. Goldstein
A Randomized Trial of Strategies for Assessing Eligibility for Long-Term Domiciliary Oxygen Therapy
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2005; 172(5): 573 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. C. Chaney, K. Jones, K. Grathwohl, and K. N. Olivier
Implementation of an Oxygen Therapy Clinic to Manage Users of Long-term Oxygen Therapy
Chest, November 1, 2002; 122(5): 1661 - 1667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Gershon, C. K. N. Chan, and G. Guyatt
Home Oxygen Requalification
Chest, July 1, 2001; 120(1): 318 - 319.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Chest Physicians.