HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lancey, R. A. Articles by Vander Salm, T. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lancey, R. A. Articles by Vander Salm, T. J.

The Use of Smaller, More Flexible Chest Drains Following Open Heart Surgery^*

An Initial Evaluation

^* From the Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA.

Correspondence to: Robert Lancey, MD, FCCP, Associate Professor of Surgery, Division of Thoracic and Cardiac Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave North, Worcester, MA 01655; e-mail: lanceyr{at}ummhc.org

Study objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of smaller-caliber drains in patients undergoing open heart surgery.

Design: A retrospective analysis of the medical records and chest radiographs assembled data on total amount of drainage, number of days of drainage, length of postoperative stay, appearance of postoperative chest radiographs, and need for further drainage from either the pleural or pericardial spaces.

Setting: A large university-based teaching hospital, where > 800 open-heart procedures are performed yearly.

Patients and interventions: A total of 202 patients underwent standard open heart surgery by one surgeon, and postoperative pleural and pericardial decompression was undertaken using small caliber, more flexible drains connected to bulb suction.

Results: Tubes were left in an average of 2.4 days, with a mean of 826.7 mL collected during that time. The average postoperative length of stay was 6.7 days (median, 5 days). At or before 6-week follow-up, chest radiographs revealed moderate or large effusions in 19 patients (9.4%) in a pleural space that had been drained postoperatively. Twelve patients (5.9%) required an additional postoperative procedure for pleural drainage (eight thoracenteses, four tube thoracostomies). Four patients (2.0%) required reexploration of the pericardium for tamponade.

Conclusions: Use of smaller-caliber drains have been found at our institution to be an adequate means of decompression of the pleural and pericardial spaces following open heart surgery, with patients rarely having clinically significant pleural effusions at 6-week follow-up.

Key Words: cardiac tamponade • chest tubes • coronary artery bypass • heart valve prosthesis implantation • pleural effusion • postoperative complications • thoracostomy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Clark, M. Licker, D. Bertin, and A. Spiliopoulos Small size new silastic drains: life-threatening hypovolemic shock after thoracic surgery associated with a non-functioning chest tube Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 31(3): 566 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Roberts, M. Boehm, M. Bates, P. C. Braidley, G. J. Cooper, and T. J. Spyt Two-center prospective randomized controlled trial of Blake versus Portex drains after cardiac surgery. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2006; 132(5): 1042 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Icard, J. Chautard, X. Zhang, M. Juanico, S. Bichi, J.-P. Lerochais, and F. Flais A single 24F Blake drain after wedge resection or lobectomy: a study on 100 consecutive cases. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 30(4): 649 - 651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Ishikura and S. Kimura The Use of Flexible Silastic Drains After Chest Surgery: Novel Thoracic Drainage Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 331 - 333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Newcomb, N. Alphonso, M. A. Norgaard, A. D. Cochrane, T. R. Karl, and C. P. Brizard High-vacuum drains rival conventional underwater-seal drains after pediatric heart surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 27(3): 395 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Terzi, B. Feil, C. Bonadiman, A. Lonardoni, I. Spilimbergo, S. Pergher, P. Scanagatta, and F. Calabro The use of flexible spiral drains after non-cardiac thoracic surgery. A clinical study Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 27(1): 134 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ege, E. Tatli, S. Canbaz, M. Cikirikcioglu, H. Sunar, B. Ozalp, and E. Duran The Importance of Intrapericardial Drain Selection in Cardiac Surgery Chest, November 1, 2004; 126(5): 1559 - 1562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Frankel, P. C. Hill, S. C. Stamou, R. C. Lowery, A. J. Pfister, A. Jain, and P. J. Corso Silastic Drains vs Conventional Chest Tubes After Coronary Artery Bypass Chest, July 1, 2003; 124(1): 108 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W. Light, J. T. Rogers, J. P. Moyers, Y. C. G. Lee, R. M. Rodriguez, W. C. Alford Jr., S. K. Ball, G. R. Burrus, W. H. Coltharp, D. M. Glassford Jr., et al. Prevalence and Clinical Course of Pleural Effusions at 30 Days after Coronary Artery and Cardiac Surgery Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2002; 166(12): 1567 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]