|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Turku Centre for Computer Science (Mr. Aittokallio); the Department of Mathematical Sciences (Dr. Nevalainen), University of Turku; the Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Clinical Allergology (Dr. Saaresranta), Turku University Central Hospital; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr. Polo-Kantola), Turku University Central Hospital; and Department of Physiology (Dr. Polo), University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Correspondence to: Tero Aittokallio, MSc, Turku Centre for Computer Science, Lemminkäisenkatu 14 A, 20520 Turku, Finland; e-mail: tero.aittokallio{at}cs.utu.fi
Study objective: To study the spectrum of inspiratory flow signal shapes in patients with partial upper airway obstruction during sleep.
Design: We identified seven different inspiratory flow shapes and determined their frequencies in two groups of patients (10 postmenopausal women and 19 men after surgical treatment for sleep apnea) and in 9 control subjects.
Setting: Sleep research unit, Department of Physiology, University of Turku, Finland.
Measurements and results: Nasal flow was recorded with nasal prongs. The shape analyses were performed with an automated attribute grammar recognizer. The inspiratory flow-shape distributions differed significantly between patients and control subjects. The flow shapes were also different between postmenopausal women and men after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.
Conclusions: The differences in the inspiratory flow-shape distributions between the control subjects and the two patient groups suggest that the upper airways behave differently in the three study groups. Automated inspiratory flow-shape analysis seems to be a promising tool to distinguish patient groups with different upper airway function to be treated with different treatment alternatives. The physiologic correlates of each flow-shape class remain to be elucidated.
Key Words: flow limitation menopause obstructive sleep apnea syndrome pattern recognition snoring uvulopalatopharyngoplasty
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Lofaso, G. Desmarais, K. Leroux, V. Zalc, R. Fodil, D. Isabey, and B. Louis Bench evaluation of flow limitation detection by automated continuous positive airway pressure devices. Chest, August 1, 2006; 130(2): 343 - 349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Abdenbi, B. Chambille, and P. Escourrou Bench testing of auto-adjusting positive airway pressure devices Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2004; 24(4): 649 - 658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Marcus, L. B. Fernandes Do Prado, J. Lutz, E. S. Katz, C. A. Black, P. Galster, and K. A. Carson Developmental changes in upper airway dynamics J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2004; 97(1): 98 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Trang, V. Leske, and C. Gaultier Use of Nasal Cannula for Detecting Sleep Apneas and Hypopneas in Infants and Children Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2002; 166(4): 464 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |