Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rakotonanahary, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fleury, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rakotonanahary, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fleury, B.
(Chest. 2001;119:460-465.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Predictive Factors for the Need for Additional Humidification During Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy*

Dominique Rakotonanahary, MD; Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury, MD, PhD; Frédéric Gagnadoux, MD and Bernard Fleury, MD

* From the Unité de Sommeil (Drs. Rakotonanahary, Gagnadoux, and Fleury), Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris; and INSERM U357 (Dr. Pelletier-Fleury), Paris, France.

Correspondence to: Bernard Fleury, MD, Unité de Sommeil, Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, 75571 Paris Cedex 12, France; e-mail: bernard.fleury{at}sat.ap-hop-paris.fr

Objective: To identify potential risk factors for the need for an additional cold or heated humidifier in nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) circuitry.

Design: A prospective cohort study.

Setting: University hospital sleep-disorders center.

Patients: Eighty-two consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome were followed up for a median of 347 days (range, 3 to 530 days) after the initiation of nCPAP therapy.

Measurements and results: In 46 patients (56%), the occurrence of upper-airway symptoms led to the addition of a cold humidifier after a median time of 39 days (range, 2 to 94 days). In 23 of the 46 patients, the persistence of the symptoms indicated the secondary use of a heated humidifier after a median time of 28 days (range, 5 to 70 days). nCPAP use (mean ± SD) was not influenced by cold humidification (4.58 ± 2.05 h/d vs 4.7 ± 2.48 h/d; p = 0.75), but it increased significantly with heated humidification (5.38 ± 2.26 h/d vs 3.51 ± 2.53 h/d; p < 0.01). Anthropometric characteristics, drying medications, clinical findings such as deformity of the nasal septum, symptoms of a chronic mucosa disease (CMD), a previous uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), and polysomnographic parameters had no significant effect on the need for a cold humidifier. Age > 60 years (odds ratio [OR], 5.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69 to 18.43), drying medications (OR, 6.59; 95% CI, 1.29 to 33.51), presence of CMD (OR, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.24 to 13.58), and previous UPPP (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.18 to 17.6) were found as significant risk factors for the addition of a heated humidifier.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that heated humidification significantly improves the nCPAP daily rate of use and that its need may be predicted.

Key Words: humidification • nasal continuous positive airway pressure • obstructive sleep apnea syndrome




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. Duong, L. Jayaram, D. Camfferman, P. Catcheside, I. Mykytyn, and R. D. McEvoy
Use of heated humidification during nasal CPAP titration in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2005; 26(4): 679 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. J. Mador, M. Krauza, A. Pervez, D. Pierce, and M. Braun
Effect of Heated Humidification on Compliance and Quality of Life in Patients With Sleep Apnea Using Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2151 - 2158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
P Gordon and M H Sanders
Sleep {middle dot} 7: Positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome
Thorax, January 1, 2005; 60(1): 68 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
F. Gagnadoux, X.L. Nguyen, D. Rakotonanahary, S. Vidal, and B. Fleury
Wrist-actigraphic estimation of sleep time under nCPAP treatment in sleep apnoea patients
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2004; 23(6): 891 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
B. Fleury, D. Rakotonanahary, B. Petelle, G. Vincent, N. P. Fleury, B. Meyer, and B. Lebeau
Mandibular Advancement Titration for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Optimization of the Procedure by Combining Clinical and Oximetric Parameters
Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5): 1761 - 1767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A.M. Neill, H.S. Wai, S.P.T. Bannan, C.R. Beasley, M. Weatherall, and A.J. Campbell
Humidified nasal continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnoea
Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2003; 22(2): 258 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Chest Physicians.