Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wattanasuwan, N.
Right arrow Articles by Sacchi, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wattanasuwan, N.
Right arrow Articles by Sacchi, T. J.
(Chest. 2001;119:502-506.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Acute Ventricular Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation*

IV Combination of Diltiazem and Digoxin vs IV Diltiazem Alone

Norrapol Wattanasuwan, MD; Ijaz A. Khan, MD; Nirav J. Mehta, MD; Pratheep Arora, MD; Narpinder Singh, MD; Balendu C. Vasavada, MD and Terrence J. Sacchi, MD

* From the Division of Cardiology (Drs. Wattanasuwan, Mehta, Arora, Singh, Vasavada, and Sacchi), Department of Medicine, Long Island College Hospital, Brooklyn, NY; and Creighton University School of Medicine (Dr. Khan), Omaha, NE.

Correspondence to: Ijaz A. Khan, MD, Creighton University Cardiac Center, 3006 Webster St, Omaha, NE 68131-2044; e-mail: ikhan{at}cardiac.creighton.edu

Objective: To analyze the efficacy of an IV combination of diltiazem and digoxin vs IV diltiazem alone for acute ventricular rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label study.

Patients and methods: Fifty-two patients with atrial fibrillation and uncontrolled ventricular rates were randomized to receive either an IV combination of diltiazem and digoxin or IV diltiazem alone and were observed for 12 h. The successful rate control was defined as a ventricular rate < 100 beats per minute (bpm) persisting for 1 h or conversion to sinus rhythm. The loss of rate control was defined as an increase in the ventricular rate to > 100 bpm persistently for > 30 min or rebound to atrial fibrillation.

Results: In both treatment arms (n = 26 each), all patients achieved successful and comparable ventricular rate control at 12 h. The mean (± SD) time taken to achieve successful rate control was shorter in the combination arm (15 ± 16 vs 22 ± 22 min). Six patients in the combination arm and 11 in the diltiazem-alone arm experienced episodes of loss of rate control. This loss in the combination arm was less than that in the diltiazem-alone arm (14 vs 39 episodes; p = 0.05). The loss of rate control per patient in the combination arm was also less than that in the diltiazem-alone arm (2.0 ± 1.0 vs 3.5 ± 1.9 episodes per patient; p = 0.04).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that in patients with atrial fibrillation who have a rapid ventricular response, the IV combination of diltiazem and digoxin results in a more efficacious ventricular rate control with fewer fluctuations than that achieved by therapy with IV diltiazem alone.

Key Words: acute ventricular rate control • atrial fibrillation • atrioventricular node-blocking agents • combination treatment • diltiazem • digoxin • loss of ventricular rate control




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 7.3: Management of Symptomatic Bradycardia and Tachycardia
Circulation, December 13, 2005; 112(24_suppl): IV-67 - IV-77.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Part 4: Advanced Life Support
Circulation, November 29, 2005; 112(22_suppl): III-25 - III-54.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Olshansky, L. E. Rosenfeld, A. L. Warner, A. J. Solomon, G. O'Neill, A. Sharma, E. Platia, G. K. Feld, T. Akiyama, M. A. Brodsky, et al.
The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study: Approaches to control rate in atrial fibrillation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 7, 2004; 43(7): 1201 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. L. McNamara, L. J. Tamariz, J. B. Segal, and E. B. Bass
Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Review of the Evidence for the Role of Pharmacologic Therapy, Electrical Cardioversion, and Echocardiography
Ann Intern Med, December 16, 2003; 139(12): 1018 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
P. Khairy and S. Nattel
New insights into the mechanisms and management of atrial fibrillation
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 29, 2002; 167(9): 1012 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G Nichol, F McAlister, B Pham, A Laupacis, B Shea, M Green, A Tang, and G Wells
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic agents at promoting sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation
Heart, June 1, 2002; 87(6): 535 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Digoxin/Diltiazem Combination Comparable to Diltiazem Alone for Rate Control in A-Fib
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, April 18, 2001; 2001(418): 5 - 5.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Chest Physicians.