Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bar-El, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Egenburg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bar-El, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Egenburg, S.
(Chest. 2001;119:511-514.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Potentially Dangerous Negative Intrapleural Pressures Generated by Ordinary Pleural Drainage Systems*

Yaron Bar-El, MD; Andre Ross, MD; Anwar Kablawi, RN and Sandro Egenburg, MA

* From the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Rambam Medical Center, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Correspondence to: Yaron Bar-El, MD, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel 35354; e-mail: y_bar_el{at}rambam.health.gov.il

Objective: Clinical observation has identified cases in which the negative pressures exerted on patient chest drains have appeared to far exceed the level of suction intended. This study was designed to test whether the use of high rates of airflow in typical pleural/mediastinal drainage systems exerts excessively high negative pressures on the chest drainage tube.

Methods: Three pleural drainage systems were tested in vitro at negative pressure settings ranging, in 5-cm H2O increments, from 5 to 35 cm H2O. At each negative-pressure setting, each device was tested with three different rates of airflow. The negative pressures exerted in the chest drain were measured by water manometer and were compared with the initial pressure settings.

Results: When a high rate of airflow was used, all three systems produced negative pressures that exceeded the pressure level initially set; two of the systems exerted negative pressures that were approximately double those intended, for all pressure settings.

Conclusions: Pleural drainage systems may exert excessive and potentially dangerous high negative pressures if high airflow is utilized. The risk to patients will be minimized if the airflow through the pressure-regulating chamber of the drainage system is adjusted to produce slow, consistent bubbling. High rates of bubbling and turbulence in the water column indicate that the negative pressure level may be excessively high, particularly for patients who do not have air leakage.

Key Words: drainage • empyema • pleural • suction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
G. Manzanet, A. Vela, R. Corell, R. Moron, R. Calderon, and C. Suelves
A Hydrodynamic Study of Pleural Drainage Systems: Some Practical Consequences
Chest, June 1, 2005; 127(6): 2211 - 2221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Chest Physicians.