Chest ACCP Career Connection
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hackner, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mohsenifar, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hackner, D.
Right arrow Articles by Mohsenifar, Z.
(Chest. 2001;119:580-589.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

The Value of a Hospitalist Service*

Efficient Care for the Aging Population?

Dani Hackner, MD; George Tu, MD; Glenn D. Braunstein, MD; Mark Ault, MD; Scott Weingarten, MD and Zab Mohsenifar, MD, FCCP

* From the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Correspondence to: Dani Hackner, MD, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, ROOM 6732, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048; e-mail: hackner{at}zynx.com

Background: We studied patients of a hospitalist teaching service and patients receiving routine private care (control subjects). We sought to evaluate whether inpatients cared for by an academic hospitalist service had lower lengths of stay and resource utilization rates.

Methods: Using monthly hospital census data, 477 hospitalist cases and 1,160 control cases were selected by explicit criteria from the Medicaid population of a large, university-affiliated, community medical center between July 1, 1996, and June 30, 1997. Outcomes in hospitalist faculty patients were compared to those of control patients under the care of private providers.

Results: Median length of stay was 4 days for control subjects and 3 days for the hospitalist service (p < 0.0001). Median total cost per case was $4,853 for control subjects and $4,002 for hospitalist patients (p < 0.0001). Only patients >= 65 years old showed statistically significant reductions in both length of stay (p < 0.0001) and total cost (p = 0.002). Subspecialty consultation rates were 37.6% for control subjects and 16.6% for hospitalist cases (p < 0.0001). We noted increasing consultations for patients >= 65 years old, especially in the control group (p = 0.001). No significant differences in mortality, 30-day readmissions, or interfacility transfers were observed.

Conclusions: Patients cared for by an academic hospitalist service that includes actively participating medical residents appear to have lower lengths of stay, total costs, and consultation rates than patients receiving routine private care. The reductions are largely observed among patients >= 65 years old.

Key Words: cost • efficiency • hospitalist • inpatient • internal medicine • length of stay • Medicaid • Medicare • Medi-Cal • outcome • residents • teaching




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. J. Glasheen, K. R. Epstein, E. Siegal, J. S. Kutner, and A. V. Prochazka
The Spectrum of Community-Based Hospitalist Practice: A Call to Tailor Internal Medicine Residency Training
Arch Intern Med, April 9, 2007; 167(7): 727 - 728.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
S. L. Ettner, J. Kotlerman, A. Afifi, S. Vazirani, R. D. Hays, M. Shapiro, and M. Cowan
An Alternative Approach to Reducing the Costs of Patient Care? A Controlled Trial of the Multi-Disciplinary Doctor-Nurse Practitioner (MDNP) Model.
Med Decis Making, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 9 - 17.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
J. Coffman and T. G. Rundall
The Impact of Hospitalists on the Cost and Quality of Inpatient Care in the United States: A Research Synthesis
Med Care Res Rev, August 1, 2005; 62(4): 379 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. M. Huddleston, K. H. Long, J. M. Naessens, D. Vanness, D. Larson, R. Trousdale, M. Plevak, M. Cabanela, D. Ilstrup, R. M. Wachter, et al.
Medical and Surgical Comanagement after Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Ann Intern Med, July 6, 2004; 141(1): 28 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
A. D. Auerbach, M. D. Aronson, R. B. Davis, and R. S. Phillips
How Physicians Perceive Hospitalist Services After Implementation: Anticipation vs Reality
Arch Intern Med, October 27, 2003; 163(19): 2330 - 2336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
M. G. Perlroth, P. Kearns, C. Wang, and D. Low
Hospital Staff, Not Attending Physicians, Provide Continuity of Care
Arch Intern Med, November 26, 2001; 161(21): 2631 - 2632.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Chest Physicians.