Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leone, F. T.
Right arrow Articles by Szefler, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leone, F. T.
Right arrow Articles by Szefler, S. J.
(Chest. 2001;119:1027-1033.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

The Utility of Peak Flow, Symptom Scores, and ß-Agonist Use as Outcome Measures in Asthma Clinical Research*

Frank T. Leone, MD, MS; Elizabeth A. Mauger, PhD; Stephen P. Peters, PhD, MD, FCCP; Vernon M. Chinchilli, PhD; James E. Fish, MD, FCCP; Homer A. Boushey, MD; Reuben M. Cherniack, MD; Jeffrey M. Drazen, MD, FCCP; John V. Fahy, MD; Jean Ford, MD, FCCP; Elliot Israel, MD, FCCP; Stephen C. Lazarus, MD; Robert F. Lemanske, MD; Richard J. Martin, MD; Stephen J. McGeady, MD; Christine Sorkness, PharmD; Stanley J. Szefler, MD and for the Asthma Clinical Research Network of the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute{dagger}

* From Thomas Jefferson University (Drs. Leone, Peters, Fish, and McGeady), Philadelphia, PA; Milton S. Hershey Medical Center (Drs. Mauger and Chinchilli), Hershey, PA; University of California at San Francisco (Drs. Boushey, Fahy, and Lazarus), San Francisco, CA; National Jewish Medical and Research Center (Drs. Cherniack, Martin, and Szefler), Denver, CO; Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Drs. Drazen and Israel), Boston, MA, The Harlem Hospital (Dr. Ford), Harlem NY; and University of Wisconsin (Drs. Lemanske and Sorkness), Madison, WI. {dagger} Additional participating investigators are listed in Appendix.

Correspondence to: Frank T. Leone, MD, MS, Jefferson Medical College, 1025 Walnut St, Room 805, Philadelphia, PA 19107; e-mail: frank.leone{at}mail.tju.edu

Study objectives: Several methods of utilizing peak expiratory flow (PEF) and other markers of disease activity have been suggested as useful in the management of asthma. It remains unclear, however, as to which surrogate markers of disease status are discriminative indicators of treatment failure, suitable for use in clinical trials.

Design: We analyzed the operating characteristics of 66 surrogate markers of treatment failure using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Participants: Information regarding FEV1, symptoms, ß2-agonist use, and PEF was available from 313 subjects previously enrolled in two Asthma Clinical Research Network trials, in which 71 treatment failures occurred (defined by a 20% fall in FEV1 from baseline).

Interventions: None.

Measurements and results: None of the measures had an acceptable ability to discriminate subjects with a >= 20% fall in FEV1 from those without, regardless of the duration of the period of analysis or the criteria for test positivity employed. Areas under the ROC curves generated ranged from 0.51 to 0.79, but none were statistically superior. Sensitivity and specificity combinations were generally poor at all cutoff values; true-positive rates could not be raised without unacceptably elevating false-positive rates concurrently.

Conclusions: Studies that seek to detect treatment failure defined by a significant fall in FEV1 should not use such individual surrogate measures to estimate disease severity.

Key Words: asthma • bronchial diseases • disease attributes • lung diseases, obstructive • patient selection • research design • status asthmaticus




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin Med ResHome page
G. L. Colice
Categorizing Asthma Severity: An Overview of National Guidelines
Clin. Med. Res., August 1, 2004; 2(3): 155 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Lee-Wong, F. M. Dayrit, A. R. Kohli, S. Acquah, and P. H. Mayo
Comparison of High-Dose Inhaled Flunisolide to Systemic Corticosteroids in Severe Adult Asthma
Chest, October 1, 2002; 122(4): 1208 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Chest Physicians.