|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Departments of Medicine and Surgery (Mr. Butler, Ms. Snyder, and Drs. Wood, Curtis, and Benditt), University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and Medical Service (Dr. Albert), Denver Health Medical Center, and Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO.
Correspondence to: Joshua O. Benditt, MD, FCCP, Respiratory Care Services, University of Washington Medical Center, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Box 356522, Seattle, WA 98195-6522
Study objectives: Incomplete follow-up can bias interpretation of data that are collected in longitudinal studies. We noted that many patients failed to return for follow-up in a study of effect of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on quality of life (QOL). Accordingly, we designed this investigation to determine the reasons patients dropped out, and to assess differences between those who continued in the study (attendees) and those who did not (nonattendees).
Design: Telephone survey.
Subjects: Patients with advanced emphysema who had undergone LVRS and had previously agreed to participate in a longitudinal QOL study.
Results: No differences were found with regard to age, gender, preoperative pulmonary function, or oxygen use between attendees and nonattendees. Long-term mortality in nonattendees (27%) was considerably greater than that seen in attendees (3%, p < 0.05). Distance from the hospital, financial burden, and living out of the region were the most common reasons cited by surviving nonattendees for their failure to return for follow-up.
Conclusions: Studies reporting the long-term mortality after LVRS can be biased in the direction of underestimating the true value if they are compromised by incomplete follow-up.
Key Words: lung volume reduction surgery mortality study design survival
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. H. Schipper, B. F. Meyers, R. J. Battafarano, T. J. Guthrie, G. A. Patterson, and J. D. Cooper Outcomes after resection of giant emphysematous bullae Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 78(3): 976 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Munro, M. J. Bailey, J. A. Smith, and G. I. Snell Lung Volume Reduction Surgery in Australia and New Zealand: Six Years On: Registry Report Chest, October 1, 2003; 124(4): 1443 - 1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Pakhale, C. Gutierrez, S. Piantadosi, A. Fishman, and the National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Gr Lung-Volume-Reduction Surgery N. Engl. J. Med., September 4, 2003; 349(10): 999 - 1000. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Ciccone, B. F. Meyers, T. J. Guthrie, G. E. Davis, R. D. Yusen, S. S. Lefrak, G. A. Patterson, and J. D. Cooper Long-term outcome of bilateral lung volume reduction in 250 consecutive patients with emphysema J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2003; 125(3): 513 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Pompeo and T. C. Mineo Long-term outcome of staged versus one-stage bilateral thoracoscopic reduction pneumoplasty Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2002; 21(4): 627 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group Patients at High Risk of Death after Lung-Volume-Reduction Surgery N. Engl. J. Med., October 11, 2001; 345(15): 1075 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |