Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baldauf, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sagy, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baldauf, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sagy, M.
(Chest. 2001;119:1166-1172.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Evaluating the Validity of Responsiveness to Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Pediatric Patients With ARDS*

An Analytic Tool

Mary Baldauf, MD; Peter Silver, MD, FCCP and Mayer Sagy, MD, FCCP

* From the Division of Critical Care Medicine, Schneider Children’s Hospital, New Hyde Park, NY.

Correspondence to: Mary Baldauf, MD, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Schneider Children’s Hospital, 269-01 76th Ave, New Hyde Park, NY 11040

Objectives: To determine whether improved oxygenation indicates a valid response to inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) therapy in patients with pediatric ARDS, and to establish an analytic tool to differentiate the iNO effects from those of other interactive factors in pediatric patients with ARDS.

Design: Consecutive case series evaluated by post hoc analysis tool.

Patients and methods: Nineteen patients treated with iNO for ARDS or pulmonary hypertension were enrolled in our study. We evaluated the PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PF ratio), oxygenation index (OI), patient position (prone vs supine), PaCO2, pH, and vasoactive drug support, and classified patients’ responsiveness to iNO into three categories: (1) possible response, an increase in PF ratio, with no alteration of the aforementioned variables in a direction known to improve oxygenation; (2) nonspecific response, an increase in PF ratio with no increase in OI, and alteration of one or more of the other four criteria in a direction known to improve oxygenation; and (3) undetermined response, an increase in both the PF ratio and OI, indicating a deliberate augmentation in ventilator support.

Results: A total of 119 data points were evaluated. Fifty data points (42%) exhibited no response to iNO. Thirty-two data points (27%) were classified as having possible responses, 35 data points (29%) as nonspecific, and 2 data points (2%) as undetermined responses to the iNO treatment.

Conclusions: In ARDS, improved oxygenation amid iNO treatment is multifactorial. In only 27% of our evaluated data points could the increase in PF ratio be attributed to iNO. We suggest that when clinically utilizing iNO, the interactive factors described by us should be taken into account for data analysis.

Key Words: ARDS • criteria • pulmonary hypertension • nitric oxide • responsiveness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Journois, C. Baufreton, P. Mauriat, P. Pouard, P. Vouhe, and D. Safran
Effects of Inhaled Nitric Oxide Administration on Early Postoperative Mortality in Patients Operated for Correction of Atrioventricular Canal Defects
Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5): 3537 - 3544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
P. Prodhan and N. Noviski
Pediatric Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Management of Oxygenation
J Intensive Care Med, May 1, 2004; 19(3): 140 - 153.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Chest Physicians.