|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
*
From the Département dadministration de la santé et Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé (Dr. Blais), Université de Montréal, Montréal; Faculté de pharmacie et Groupe de recherche en Épidémiologie (Dr. Grégoire), Université Laval, Québec city; Centre universitaire de santé de lEstrie (Ms. Rouleau), Sherbrooke; Service de pneumologie (Dr. Cartier), Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal; Centre hospitalier St-Joseph de La Malbaie (Dr. Bouchard), La Malbaie; and Centre de pneumologie de lHôpital Laval (Dr. Boulet), Institut de cardiologie et de pneumologie de lUniversité Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
A complete list of participants is given in the Appendix.
Correspondence to: Régis Blais, PhD, Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaie en santé, Université de Montréal, PO Box 6128, Station Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7; e-mail: Regis.Blais{at}umontreal.ca
Study objectives: To assess whether the utilization of inhaled short-acting ß2-agonists (ISAB) and inhaled long-acting ß2-agonists (ILAB) for the treatment of asthma was appropriate according to the 1996 Canadian Asthma Consensus Conference recommendations.
Design: Population-based retrospective drug utilization review using pharmacists billing data of the Prescription Drug Insurance Plan administered by the Quebec health insurance board. However, the database used did not contain complete patient clinical information to accurately assess severity of asthma.
Setting: Province of Quebec, Canada.
Patients: Persons who received at least one outpatient prescription of ISAB (age range, 5 to 45 years) or ILAB (age range, 12 to 45 years) for the treatment of asthma between August 1997 and April 1998.
Measurements: Percentages of patients whose use was appropriate according to three criteria regarding the average daily dose of ISAB (criterion 1), the renewal interval of ILAB (criterion 2), and the concomitant daily use of corticosteroids for the expected length of utilization of ILAB (criterion 3).
Results: Overall proportions of appropriate use according to criterion 1 were as follows: 75% (without inhaled corticosteroids [ICS]) and 84% and 43% (with one or more than one prescription of ICS, respectively). Appropriateness was slightly higher for female patients, younger patients (5 to 18 years old), and those treated by pediatricians. However, appropriateness was only 9% among patients who received at least two prescriptions of ISAB during the study period. The proportion of appropriate use was 19% according to criterion 2 and 15% according to criterion 3; there were few differences by gender or by age, but the appropriateness according to criterion 2 was somewhat higher for patients of respirologists.
Conclusion: Compared to the 1996 Canadian asthma consensus conference recommendations, ISAB are overused, ICS are underused, and ILAB are often used improperly. Close collaboration between health professionals and patients is essential to improve the pharmacotherapy of asthma.
Key Words: asthma Canadian consensus corticosteroids drug utilization review inhaled ß2-agonists
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Senthilselvan, J. A. Lawson, D. C. Rennie, and J. A. Dosman Regular Use of Corticosteroids and Low Use of Short-Acting {beta}2-Agonists Can Reduce Asthma Hospitalization Chest, April 1, 2005; 127(4): 1242 - 1251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Blais and M-F Beauchesne Use of inhaled corticosteroids following discharge from an emergency department for an acute exacerbation of asthma Thorax, November 1, 2004; 59(11): 943 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Lynd, D. P. Guh, P. D. Pare, and A. H. Anis Patterns of Inhaled Asthma Medication Use: A 3-Year Longitudinal Analysis of Prescription Claims Data From British Columbia, Canada Chest, December 1, 2002; 122(6): 1973 - 1981. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |