Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blais, R.
Right arrow Articles by Boulet, L.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blais, R.
Right arrow Articles by Boulet, L.-P.
(Chest. 2001;119:1316-1321.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Ambulatory Use of Inhaled ß2-Agonists for the Treatment of Asthma in Quebec*

A Population-Based Utilization Review

Régis Blais, PhD; Jean-Pierre Grégoire, PhD; Rachel Rouleau, MSc; André Cartier, MD; Jacques Bouchard, MD; Louis-Philippe Boulet, MD and and the Comité de revue de l’utilisation des médicaments{dagger}

* From the Département d’administration de la santé et Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé (Dr. Blais), Université de Montréal, Montréal; Faculté de pharmacie et Groupe de recherche en Épidémiologie (Dr. Grégoire), Université Laval, Québec city; Centre universitaire de santé de l’Estrie (Ms. Rouleau), Sherbrooke; Service de pneumologie (Dr. Cartier), Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal; Centre hospitalier St-Joseph de La Malbaie (Dr. Bouchard), La Malbaie; and Centre de pneumologie de l’Hôpital Laval (Dr. Boulet), Institut de cardiologie et de pneumologie de l’Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada. {dagger} A complete list of participants is given in the Appendix.

Correspondence to: Régis Blais, PhD, Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaie en santé, Université de Montréal, PO Box 6128, Station Centre-ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3C 3J7; e-mail: Regis.Blais{at}umontreal.ca

Study objectives: To assess whether the utilization of inhaled short-acting ß2-agonists (ISAB) and inhaled long-acting ß2-agonists (ILAB) for the treatment of asthma was appropriate according to the 1996 Canadian Asthma Consensus Conference recommendations.

Design: Population-based retrospective drug utilization review using pharmacists’ billing data of the Prescription Drug Insurance Plan administered by the Quebec health insurance board. However, the database used did not contain complete patient clinical information to accurately assess severity of asthma.

Setting: Province of Quebec, Canada.

Patients: Persons who received at least one outpatient prescription of ISAB (age range, 5 to 45 years) or ILAB (age range, 12 to 45 years) for the treatment of asthma between August 1997 and April 1998.

Measurements: Percentages of patients whose use was appropriate according to three criteria regarding the average daily dose of ISAB (criterion 1), the renewal interval of ILAB (criterion 2), and the concomitant daily use of corticosteroids for the expected length of utilization of ILAB (criterion 3).

Results: Overall proportions of appropriate use according to criterion 1 were as follows: 75% (without inhaled corticosteroids [ICS]) and 84% and 43% (with one or more than one prescription of ICS, respectively). Appropriateness was slightly higher for female patients, younger patients (5 to 18 years old), and those treated by pediatricians. However, appropriateness was only 9% among patients who received at least two prescriptions of ISAB during the study period. The proportion of appropriate use was 19% according to criterion 2 and 15% according to criterion 3; there were few differences by gender or by age, but the appropriateness according to criterion 2 was somewhat higher for patients of respirologists.

Conclusion: Compared to the 1996 Canadian asthma consensus conference recommendations, ISAB are overused, ICS are underused, and ILAB are often used improperly. Close collaboration between health professionals and patients is essential to improve the pharmacotherapy of asthma.

Key Words: asthma • Canadian • consensus • corticosteroids • drug utilization review • inhaled ß2-agonists




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Senthilselvan, J. A. Lawson, D. C. Rennie, and J. A. Dosman
Regular Use of Corticosteroids and Low Use of Short-Acting {beta}2-Agonists Can Reduce Asthma Hospitalization
Chest, April 1, 2005; 127(4): 1242 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
L Blais and M-F Beauchesne
Use of inhaled corticosteroids following discharge from an emergency department for an acute exacerbation of asthma
Thorax, November 1, 2004; 59(11): 943 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
L. D. Lynd, D. P. Guh, P. D. Pare, and A. H. Anis
Patterns of Inhaled Asthma Medication Use: A 3-Year Longitudinal Analysis of Prescription Claims Data From British Columbia, Canada
Chest, December 1, 2002; 122(6): 1973 - 1981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Chest Physicians.