|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
*
From Novartis Pharmaceuticals (Dr. Kottakis and Mr. Rapatz), Horsham, UK; the Primary Care Asthma Clinic (Dr. DUrzo), Toronto, Canada; Hospital General de Agudos "E." Tornu (Dr. De Salvo), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Hospital de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares y del Torax IMSS (Dr. Ramirez-Rivera), Monterrey, Mexico; Hospital Sao Joao, Servico de Pneumologia (Dr. Almeida), Porto, Portugal; and Papanicolaou Hospital, Pneumonological University Clinic (Dr. Sichletidis), Thessaloniki, Greece.
A complete list of participants is located in the Appendix.
Correspondence to: John Kottakis, MD, Novartis HRC, Wimblehurst Rd, Horsham, RH12 5AB, UK; e-mail: ioannis.kottakis{at}pharma.novartis.com
Study objectives: To compare the efficacy of adding formoterol or salbutamol to regular ipratropium bromide treatment in COPD patients whose conditions were suboptimally controlled with ipratropium bromide alone.
Design: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, two-period, crossover clinical trial.
Setting: Twenty-four clinics and university medical centers in nine countries.
Patients: One
hundred seventy-two patients with baseline FEV1
65%
predicted, with FEV1 reversibility to salbutamol not
exceeding the normal variability of the measurement, and symptomatic
despite regular treatment with ipratropium bromide.
Interventions: Each patient received two treatments in random order: either inhaled formoterol dry powder, 12 µg bid, in addition to ipratropium bromide, 40 µg qid for 3 weeks, followed by salbutamol, 200 µg qid, in addition to ipratropium, 40 µg qid for 3 weeks, or vice versa.
Measurements and results: Efficacy end points included morning premedication peak expiratory flow (PEF) during the last week of treatment (primary end point), the area under the curve (AUC) for FEV1 measured for 6 h after morning dose on the last day of treatment, and symptom scores (from daily diary recordings). Morning PEF and the AUC for FEV1 were significantly better for formoterol/ipratropium than for salbutamol/ipratropium (p = 0.0003 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The formoterol/ipratropium combination also induced a greater improvement in mean total symptom scores (p = 0.0042). The safety profile of the two treatments was comparable.
Conclusions: In COPD patients requiring combination bronchodilator treatment, the addition of formoterol to regular ipratropium treatment is more effective than the addition of salbutamol.
Key Words: ß2-agonist COPD formoterol ipratropium salbutamol
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A. van Noord, J. L. Aumann, E. Janssens, J. Verhaert, J. J. Smeets, A. Mueller, and P. J. G. Cornelissen Effects of Tiotropium With and Without Formoterol on Airflow Obstruction and Resting Hyperinflation in Patients With COPD Chest, March 1, 2006; 129(3): 509 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R A Stockley, N Chopra, L Rice, and on behalf of the SMS40026 Investigator Group Addition of salmeterol to existing treatment in patients with COPD: a 12 month study Thorax, February 1, 2006; 61(2): 122 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Donohue Combination Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Clinical Aspects Proceedings of the ATS, November 1, 2005; 2(4): 272 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Vincken Bronchodilator treatment of stable COPD: long-acting anticholinergics Eur. Respir. Rev., September 1, 2005; 14(94): 23 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Barnes and R. A. Stockley COPD: current therapeutic interventions and future approaches Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2005; 25(6): 1084 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Buhl and S. G. Farmer Future Directions in the Pharmacologic Therapy of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Proceedings of the ATS, April 1, 2005; 2(1): 83 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Buhl and S. G. Farmer Current and Future Pharmacologic Therapy of Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma Proceedings of the ATS, April 1, 2004; 1(2): 136 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cazzola and M. G. Matera Long-Acting Bronchodilators Are the First-Choice Option for the Treatment of Stable COPD Chest, January 1, 2004; 125(1): 9 - 11. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Tashkin and C. B. Cooper The Role of Long-Acting Bronchodilators in the Management of Stable COPD Chest, January 1, 2004; 125(1): 249 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A Dougherty, B. L Didur, and L. S Aboussouan Long-Acting Inhaled {beta}2-Agonists for Stable COPD Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2003; 37(9): 1247 - 1255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Hanania, A. Sharafkhaneh, R. Barber, and B. F. Dickey {beta}-Agonist Intrinsic Efficacy: Measurement and Clinical Significance Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2002; 165(10): 1353 - 1358. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rossi, P. Kristufek, B. E. Levine, M. H. Thomson, D. Till, J. Kottakis, and G. Della Cioppa Comparison of the Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety of Formoterol Dry Powder and Oral, Slow-Release Theophylline in the Treatment of COPD* Chest, April 1, 2002; 121(4): 1058 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.J. Rees Tiotropium in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(2): 205 - 206. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |