Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cirignotta, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sancisi, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cirignotta, F.
Right arrow Articles by Sancisi, E.
(Chest. 2001;119:1387-1392.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Unreliability of Automatic Scoring of MESAM 4 in Assessing Patients With Complicated Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome*

Fabio Cirignotta, MD; Susanna Mondini, MD; Roberto Gerardi, MD; Barbara Mostacci, MD and Elisa Sancisi, MD

* From the Sleep Medicine Unit, Unit of Neurology, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Correspondence to: Fabio Cirignotta, MD, Sleep Medicine Unit, Unit of Neurology, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, via Albertoni 15, 40138 Bologna, Italy; e-mail: cirignotta{at}orsola-malpighi.med.unibo.it

Background: Portable devices are used for unattended recording of patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). The MESAM 4 (MAP; Martinsried, Germany) is a computerized ambulatory polysomnographic system that records four parameters: breathing noise, heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), and body position.

Design and method: We evaluated the reliability of the oxygen desaturation index (ODI) automatically calculated by the MESAM 4 device in evaluating patients with "complicated" OSAS. These patients present SaO2 drops due to apneas associated with a fall in baseline SaO2 during sleep, as occurs in the "overlap syndrome." Ten patients with complicated OSAS underwent nocturnal MESAM 4 recordings, and we compared the visual and automatic scorings of the ODI.

Results: The ODI obtained with visual scoring was significantly higher than ODI automatically calculated by the MESAM 4 in all patients. In some patients, this difference was so significant that it could bias clinical judgment of OSAS severity. We demonstrated that the system did not identify those desaturation events that were superimposed on a fall in baseline SaO2. The error depends on the algorithm by which the device recognizes the desaturation events and calculates the baseline SaO2.

Conclusion: Automatic analysis of MESAM 4 recordings may be misleading in evaluating OSAS patients who have a fall in baseline SaO2 during sleep. In this case, visual scoring performed by a trained polysomnographer is recommended.

Key Words: cardiorespiratory monitoring • MESAM 4 • sleep apnea




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ChestHome page
A. Bar, G. Pillar, I. Dvir, J. Sheffy, R. P. Schnall, and P. Lavie
Evaluation of a Portable Device Based on Peripheral Arterial Tone for Unattended Home Sleep Studies
Chest, March 1, 2003; 123(3): 695 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Chest Physicians.