|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (Drs. Sonna and Patton, and Mss. Angel and Sharp), Natick, MA; US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (Dr. Knapik), Aberdeen Proving Ground, Aberdeen, MD; and Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Dr. Lilly), Brigham and Womens Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Correspondence to: Larry A. Sonna, MD, PhD, US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, 42 Kansas St, Natick, MA 01760; e-mail: larry.sonna{at}na.amedd.army.mil
Study objectives: To measure the prevalence of exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB) and to determine its effect on the physical performance response to training in otherwise healthy young adults.
Design: Observational, retrospective study.
Setting: Fort Jackson, SC, May to July 1998.
Participants: One hundred thirty-seven ethnically diverse US Army recruits undergoing an 8-week Army basic training course.
Measurements and results: Subjects
underwent exercise challenge testing at the end of basic training to
evaluate for EIB (defined as a decrease in FEV1 of
15%, 1 or 10 min after running to peak oxygen uptake on a
treadmill). Those subjects who were unable to run to peak oxygen
uptake, or who were unable to perform two baseline FEV1
maneuvers the results of which were within 5% of each other, were
excluded from analysis. We measured peak oxygen uptake on a treadmill
and the scores achieved on the components of the US Army physical
fitness test (APFT). Of 137 subjects, 121 (58 men and 63 women) met our
inclusion criteria. Eight subjects (7%) had EIB. Subjects who
experienced EIB and unaffected control subjects both showed
statistically significant gains in performance on the APFT events
during basic training. At the end of basic training, peak oxygen uptake
levels and APFT event scores were not significantly different between
subjects with EIB and unaffected control subjects.
Conclusions: Seven percent of the US Army recruits who were tested had EIB, but this did not hinder their physical performance gains during basic training. EIB per se should not be an absolute reason to exclude individuals from employment in jobs with heavy physical demands.
Key Words: asthma athletic performance epidemiology exercise-induced asthma military medicine oxygen uptake physical fitness physical training
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Oguma, L. J. Palmer, E. Birben, L. A. Sonna, K. Asano, and C. M. Lilly Role of Prostanoid DP Receptor Variants in Susceptibility to Asthma N. Engl. J. Med., October 21, 2004; 351(17): 1752 - 1763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Worsnop Asthma and Physical Activity Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 421 - 422. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. S. Ford, G. W. Heath, D. M. Mannino, and S. C. Redd Leisure-Time Physical Activity Patterns Among US Adults With Asthma Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 432 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Sonna, M. A. Sharp, J. J. Knapik, M. Cullivan, K. C. Angel, J. F. Patton, and C. M. Lilly Angiotensin-converting enzyme genotype and physical performance during US Army basic training J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2001; 91(3): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |