Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartzman, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paterson, D. I.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartzman, K.
(Chest. 2001;119:1791-1800.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Strategies Incorporating Spiral CT for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism*

A Cost-effectiveness Analysis

D. Ian Paterson, MD and Kevin Schwartzman, MD, MPH

* From the Division of Cardiology (Dr. Paterson), McGill University Health Centre, and Respiratory Epidemiology Unit (Dr. Schwartzman), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Correspondence to: Kevin Schwartzman, MD, MPH, Respiratory Epidemiology Unit, McGill University, 1110 Pine University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A3: e-mail: KEVINS{at}MEAKINS.LAN.McGILL.CA

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of spiral CT for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism.

Design: Computer-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Patients: Simulated cohort of 1,000 patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE), with a prevalence of 28.4%, as in the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis study.

Interventions: Using a decision-analysis model, seven diagnostic strategies were compared, which incorporated combinations of ventilation-perfusion (/) scans, duplex ultrasound of the legs, spiral CT, and conventional pulmonary angiography.

Measurements and results: Expected survival and cost (in Canadian dollars) at 3 months were estimated. Four of the strategies yielded poorer survival at higher cost. The three remaining strategies were as follows: (1) / ± leg ultrasound ± spiral CT, with an expected survival of 953.4 per 1,000 patients and a cost of $1,391 per patient; (2) / ± leg ultrasound ± pulmonary angiography (the "traditional" algorithm), with an expected survival of 953.7 per 1,000 patients and a cost of $1,416 per patient; and (3) spiral CT ± leg ultrasound, with an expected survival of 958.2 per 1,000 patients and a cost of $1,751 per patient. The traditional algorithm was then excluded by extended dominance. The cost per additional life saved was $70,833 for spiral CT ± leg ultrasound relative to / ± leg ultrasound ± spiral CT.

Conclusions: Spiral CT can replace pulmonary angiography in patients with nondiagnostic / scan and negative leg ultrasound findings. This approach is likely as effective as—and possibly less expensive than—the current algorithm for diagnosis of acute PE. When spiral CT is the initial diagnostic test, followed by leg ultrasound, expected survival improves but costs are also considerably higher. These findings were robust to variations in the assumed sensitivity and specificity of spiral CT.

Key Words: cost-effectiveness • CT • pulmonary embolism




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Hayashino, M. Goto, Y. Noguchi, and T. Fukui
Ventilation-Perfusion Scanning and Helical CT in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 740 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. E. Cox, S. S. Carson, and A. K. Biddle
Cost-effectiveness of Ultrasound in Preventing Femoral Venous Catheter-associated Pulmonary Embolism
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2003; 168(12): 1481 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Kameyama, C.-l. Huang, D. Liu, T. Okamoto, E. Hayashi, Y. Yamamoto, and H. Yokomise
Pulmonary embolism after lung resection: diagnosis and treatment
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 599 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Perrier, M. R. Nendaz, F. P. Sarasin, N. Howarth, and H. Bounameaux
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Diagnostic Strategies for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Including Helical Computed Tomography
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2003; 167(1): 39 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
O. Dabbagh and C. Kaplan
Spiral CT Is Not the Final Answer
Chest, June 1, 2002; 121(6): 2083 - 2083.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. Pistolesi and M. Miniati
Imaging techniques in treatment algorithms of pulmonary embolism
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 28S - 39s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Is Spiral CT a Cost-Effective Test for Diagnosing PE?
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, July 19, 2001; 2001(719): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Chest Physicians.