|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Cardiology (Dr. Paterson), McGill University Health Centre, and Respiratory Epidemiology Unit (Dr. Schwartzman), McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Correspondence to: Kevin Schwartzman, MD, MPH, Respiratory Epidemiology Unit, McGill University, 1110 Pine University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A3: e-mail: KEVINS{at}MEAKINS.LAN.McGILL.CA
Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of spiral CT for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism.
Design: Computer-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Patients: Simulated cohort of 1,000 patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE), with a prevalence of 28.4%, as in the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis study.
Interventions: Using a decision-analysis model, seven
diagnostic strategies were compared, which incorporated combinations of
ventilation-perfusion (
/
) scans, duplex ultrasound of the
legs, spiral CT, and conventional pulmonary angiography.
Measurements and results: Expected survival and cost (in
Canadian dollars) at 3 months were estimated. Four of the strategies
yielded poorer survival at higher cost. The three remaining strategies
were as follows: (1)
/
± leg ultrasound ±
spiral CT, with an expected survival of 953.4 per 1,000 patients and a
cost of $1,391 per patient; (2)
/
± leg
ultrasound ± pulmonary angiography (the "traditional"
algorithm), with an expected survival of 953.7 per 1,000 patients and a
cost of $1,416 per patient; and (3) spiral CT ± leg ultrasound,
with an expected survival of 958.2 per 1,000 patients and a cost of
$1,751 per patient. The traditional algorithm was then excluded by
extended dominance. The cost per additional life saved was $70,833 for
spiral CT ± leg ultrasound relative to
/
±
leg ultrasound ± spiral CT.
Conclusions:
Spiral CT can replace pulmonary angiography in patients with
nondiagnostic
/
scan and negative leg ultrasound
findings. This approach is likely as effective asand possibly less
expensive thanthe current algorithm for diagnosis of acute PE. When
spiral CT is the initial diagnostic test, followed by leg ultrasound,
expected survival improves but costs are also considerably higher.
These findings were robust to variations in the assumed sensitivity and
specificity of spiral CT.
Key Words: cost-effectiveness CT pulmonary embolism
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Hayashino, M. Goto, Y. Noguchi, and T. Fukui Ventilation-Perfusion Scanning and Helical CT in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 740 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Cox, S. S. Carson, and A. K. Biddle Cost-effectiveness of Ultrasound in Preventing Femoral Venous Catheter-associated Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 15, 2003; 168(12): 1481 - 1487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kameyama, C.-l. Huang, D. Liu, T. Okamoto, E. Hayashi, Y. Yamamoto, and H. Yokomise Pulmonary embolism after lung resection: diagnosis and treatment Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2003; 76(2): 599 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Perrier, M. R. Nendaz, F. P. Sarasin, N. Howarth, and H. Bounameaux Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Diagnostic Strategies for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Including Helical Computed Tomography Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2003; 167(1): 39 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Dabbagh and C. Kaplan Spiral CT Is Not the Final Answer Chest, June 1, 2002; 121(6): 2083 - 2083. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pistolesi and M. Miniati Imaging techniques in treatment algorithms of pulmonary embolism Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 28S - 39s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Is Spiral CT a Cost-Effective Test for Diagnosing PE? Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, July 19, 2001; 2001(719): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |