Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parulekar, W.
Right arrow Articles by Bociek, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parulekar, W.
Right arrow Articles by Bociek, G.
(Chest. 2001;120:19-25.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

Use of Small-Bore vs Large-Bore Chest Tubes for Treatment of Malignant Pleural Effusions*

Wendy Parulekar, MD,; Gina Di Primio, MD,; Fred Matzinger, MD,; Carole Dennie, MD, and Gregory Bociek, MD

* From the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (Dr. Parulekar), Queen’s University, Kingston ON; the Department of Radiology (Drs. Di Primio, Matzinger, and Dennie), University of Ottawa, Ottawa ON; the Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology (Dr. Bociek), University of Nebraska Medical Centre, Omaha, NE.

Correspondence to: Wendy Parulekar, MD, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group, Queens University, 82 Barrie St, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada; e-mail: wparulekar{at}ctg.queensu.ca

Abstract

Study objective: To evaluate the efficacy of small-bore (12 French vanSonnenberg) catheters compared with standard large-bore chest tubes in the drainage and sclerotherapy of malignant pleural effusions.

Design: Retrospective review.

Setting: An academic tertiary care hospital.

Patients: Adult patients with documented neoplasms and malignant pleural effusions, treated between 1986 and 1995.

Intervention: All patients included in the study underwent drainage of malignant pleural effusions either by large-bore chest tube or by ultrasound-guided small-bore catheter. After drainage, pleurodesis was performed.

Results: Outcome as defined by recurrence of effusion was determined by blinded examination of all postpleurodesis chest radiographs. We identified 58 cases of malignant pleural effusion in which small-bore catheters were used and 44 in which large-bore chest tubes were used. The majority of patients had breast (n = 56, 55%) or lung cancer (n = 29, 28%). The median age was 65 years. Fifty-nine patients were actively being treated with chemotherapy at the time of pleurodesis. The following sclerosing agents were used: talc, 27 (26%); tetracycline, 72 (70%); bleomycin, 2 (2%); and interferon, 1 (1%). Actuarial probabilities of recurrence at 6 weeks and 4 months were 45% and 53% for the small tubes vs 45% and 51% for the large tubes. Univariate and multivariate analyses failed to demonstrate that tube size had any influence on the rate of recurrence.

Conclusions: We were unable to detect any major differences in outcomes with the use of either size of chest tube. Our study suggests that small-bore catheters may be effective in the treatment of malignant pleural effusions and deserve further evaluation in prospectively designed trials.

Key Words: chest tubes • complications • indwelling catheters • malignant pleural effusion • pleurodesis • recurrence




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
A. R. Haas, D. H. Sterman, and A. I. Musani
Malignant Pleural Effusions: Management Options With Consideration of Coding, Billing, and a Decision Approach
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3): 1036 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Tan, A. Sedrakyan, J. Browne, S. Swift, and T. Treasure
The evidence on the effectiveness of management for malignant pleural effusion: a systematic review.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 29(5): 829 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
Y. Aelony and W. Parulekar
Dry Talc Pleurodesis Via Chest Tube
Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1): 308 - 308.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. Cardillo, F. Facciolo, L. Carbone, M. Regal, F. Corzani, A. Ricci, M. Di Martino, and M. Martelli
Long-term follow-up of video-assisted talc pleurodesis in malignant recurrent pleural effusions
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2002; 21(2): 302 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Chest Physicians.