HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bellemare, F. Articles by Lafontaine, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bellemare, F. Articles by Lafontaine, E.

Anatomic Landmarks To Estimate the Length of the Diaphragm From Chest Radiographs^*

Effects of Emphysema and Lung Volume Reduction Surgery

^* From the Research Centre (Dr. Bellemare) and Departments of Anesthesiology (Dr. Couture), Radiology (Dr. Cordeau), Pneumology (Dr. Leblanc), and Surgery (Dr. Lafontaine), Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Hôtel-Dieu, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Correspondence to: François Bellemare, PhD, Centre de recherche, Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Hôtel-Dieu, 3850 rue St-Urbain, Montréal, Québec, Canada H2W 1T8; e-mail: francois.bellemare{at}umontreal.ca

Study objectives: To define anatomic landmarks that can be used to predict insertions of the diaphragm on chest radiographs and to estimate diaphragm length.

Design: Prospective clinical trial with a parallel group design.

Setting: Laboratory investigations in normal volunteers recruited by advertisement and in emphysema outpatients being evaluated for elective bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).

Patients: Twenty-six normal subjects classified into young and older age groups, with a third group of 13 emphysema patients matched for age and sex with the older group.

Measurements: Identification and between-group comparisons were made of anatomic landmarks on anteroposterior and lateral chest radiographs obtained at total lung capacity. Predicted landmarks were generated from normal subjects. Within-subject and between-group comparisons were made of diaphragm length index (DLI) based on observed anatomic landmarks (DLIobs) and diaphragm length index based on predicted anatomic landmarks (DLIpred) at functional residual capacity.

Results: Anatomic landmarks were not different between the three groups or between male and female subjects, and were not different before and after LVRS in emphysema patients. No difference was found between DLIobs and DLIpred in normal subjects and emphysema patients, but both were smaller in emphysema patients than in normal subjects and increased after LVRS in emphysema patients.

Conclusion: This study validates the use of anatomic landmarks to estimate DLI. Using these landmarks simplifies the determination of diaphragmatic lengths and could be a useful tool for the evaluation of the functional capacity of the diaphragm, and possibly as a prognostic indicator of patients who are candidates for LVRS.

Key Words: chest radiograph • diaphragm length • emphysema • lung volume reduction surgery

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Bellemare, A. Jeanneret, and J. Couture Sex Differences in Thoracic Dimensions and Configuration Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2003; 168(3): 305 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. B. Gorman, D. K. McKenzie, N. B. Pride, J. F. Tolman, and S. C. Gandevia Diaphragm Length during Tidal Breathing in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2002; 166(11): 1461 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]