HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Goldberg, S. Articles by Bar-Yishay, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Goldberg, S. Articles by Bar-Yishay, E.

Can Peak Expiratory Flow Measurements Estimate Small Airway Function in Asthmatic Children?^*

^* From the Institute of Pulmonology, Hadassah University Hospital, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.

Correspondence to: Ephraim Bar-Yishay, PhD, Institute of Pulmonology, Hadassah University Hospital, PO Box 12000, Jerusalem, Israel 91120; e-mail: EPHRAIMB{at}CC.HUJI.AC.IL

Background: Asthma is characterized in part by small airways dysfunction. Peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurement has been suggested by all international guidelines as an important tool in asthma management. The correlation between PEF and FEV₁ but not with forced expired flow at 50% of vital capacity (FEF₅₀) is well-established.

Study objective: To determine the value of PEF measurement as a predictor of small airways status as expressed by FEF₅₀.

Design: Analysis of the association between PEF and FEF₅₀ in single and multiple determinations.

Patients: One hundred eleven asthmatic children (mean age, 11.8 years), grouped in the following way according to FEV₁ values: within normal range (n = 46); mildly reduced FEV₁ (n = 44); and moderately/severely reduced FEV₁ (n = 21).

Results: Overall, FEF₅₀ and PEF were significantly correlated (r = 0.49; p < 0.0001). However, in 41.6% of the patients, the actual FEF₅₀ differed by > 20% from the calculated FEF₅₀. PEF has a high specificity (82.4%) but a poor sensitivity (51.7%) to detect FEF₅₀ status. PEF was better able to reflect abnormal FEF₅₀ in the patients with more severe asthma and to reflect normal FEF₅₀ values in the healthier patients. In patients with multiple measurements (n = 40), the correlation between FEF₅₀ and PEF was significantly better than that derived from a single determination (multiple measurements r = 0.77; single measurement, r = 0.49).

Conclusions: Although PEF is an important tool in the management of asthmatic patients, it does not yield a complete picture because it is not sensitive in detecting small airways function. It is best used at home along with regular spirometry measurements at the clinic. PEF may serve as a better index of changes in small airways function once an individual regression is determined.

Key Words: forced expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity • FEV₁ • lung function tests

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Vilozni, L. Bentur, O. Efrati, A. Barak, A. Szeinberg, D. Shoseyov, Y. Yahav, and A. Augarten Exercise Challenge Test in 3- to 6-Year-Old Asthmatic Children Chest, August 1, 2007; 132(2): 497 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A K Simonds Streamlining weaning: protocols and weaning units Thorax, March 1, 2005; 60(3): 175 - 182. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P L P Brand and R J Roorda Usefulness of monitoring lung function in asthma Arch. Dis. Child., November 1, 2003; 88(11): 1021 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]