HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Demers, R. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Demers, R. R.

Bacterial/Viral Filtration^*

Let the Breather Beware!

^* From Demers Consulting Services, Carmel, CA.

Correspondence to: Robert R. Demers, BS, RRT, 225 Crossroads Blvd, PMB 415, Carmel, CA 93923; e-mail: BobDemers{at}AOL.com

Most clinicians believe that any device that is marketed as a "bacterial/viral filter" must necessarily be capable of capturing any individual bacteria or viruses that might be suspended within inhaled or exhaled gases. We were surprised to discover that this is, by no means, a justifiable assumption. This article describes testing methods that manufacturers employ to generate the often-misleading efficiency specifications that are claimed for some of these devices. We discuss articles that have documented the presence of airborne pathogens in the effluent of a ventilator circuit, and characterize the attributes that a competent filter must exhibit if it is to succeed in protecting patients and caregivers from incidental exposure to bacteria, viruses, aerosolized drugs, and endotoxins. This article continues with a discussion of the numbers of particles that are commonly produced with commercially available pneumatic nebulizers, the comparative performance characteristics of filters and heat/moisture exchanging filters (HMEFs), and the success or failure of various brands of HMEFs to comply with the guidelines recently developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the management of patients who are harboring active tuberculosis. The presentation concludes with a description of the standards that apply to any filter that classifies as a high-efficiency particulate aerosol (HEPA) device, and demonstrates that the performance of filters/HMEFs in common clinical use can range from approximately 1/50th to > 30-fold the efficiency of a HEPA-grade device. Those who frequent the bedside of patients receiving ventilation might unwittingly be placing themselves at considerable risk of exposure to infectious microaerosols, but methods are available to dramatically decrease those risks.

Key Words: bacterial/viral filter • endotoxin • heat/moisture exchanging filter • high-efficiency particulate aerosol • tuberculosis

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Wenzel, M. Klauke, F. Gessenhardt, D. Dellweg, P. Haidl, B. Schonhofer, and D. Kohler Sterile Water Is Unnecessary in a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Convection-Type Humidifier in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2138 - 2140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Turnbull, P. C. Fisher, G. H. Mills, and N. J. Morgan-Hughes Performance of breathing filters under wet conditions: a laboratory evaluation Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2005; 94(5): 675 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Demers Drugs Prescribed for Patients Shouldn't Be Taken by Caregivers! Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1012 - 1013. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Olsen, H.-L. Chang, T. Y.-Y. Cheung, A. F.-Y. Tang, T. L. Fisk, S. P.-L. Ooi, H.-W. Kuo, D. D.-S. Jiang, K.-T. Chen, J. Lando, et al. Transmission of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome on Aircraft N. Engl. J. Med., December 18, 2003; 349(25): 2416 - 2422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]