Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clini, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ambrosino, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clini, E.
Right arrow Articles by Ambrosino, N.
(Chest. 2001;120:1500-1505.)
© 2001 American College of Chest Physicians

In-Hospital Short-term Training Program for Patients With Chronic Airway Obstruction*

Enrico Clini, MD, FCCP; Katia Foglio, MD; Luca Bianchi, MD; Roberto Porta, MD; Michele Vitacca, MD and Nicolino Ambrosino, MD, FCCP

* From the Salvatore Maugeri Foundation IRCCS, Lung Function Unit, Scientific Institute of Gussago, Italy.

Correspondence to: Enrico Clini, MD, FCCP, Division of Pneumology, Fondazione Maugeri IRCCS, Via Pinidolo 23, 25064 Gussago (BS), Italy; e-mail: eclini{at}qubisoft.it

Objective: To compare the functional benefits and relative costs of administering an intense short-term inpatient vs a longer outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program (PRP) for patients with chronic airway obstruction (CAO).

Design: Retrospective case-control study.

Setting: Pulmonary ward and outpatient clinic of a rehabilitation center.

Patients: Forty-three patients (case subjects) selected on the basis of selection criteria were compared with control subjects matched to them for age, sex, FEV1, and diagnosis of either COPD or asthma. Case subjects performed 10 to 12 daily sessions (5 sessions a week) of inpatient PRP; control subjects performed 20 to 24 sessions (3 sessions a week) of outpatient PRP.

Measurements: At baseline and after the PRP, an incremental exercise test was performed, including evaluation of dyspnea and leg fatigue by Borg scale (D and F, respectively) at each workload step. The cost of PRP was also evaluated.

Results: Both PRPs resulted in similar significant improvements in cycloergometry peak workload (from 68 ± 18 to 82 ± 22 and from 75 ± 17 to 87 ± 27 W in case subjects and control subjects, respectively), isoload D (from 6.4 ± 1.6 to 4.2 ± 1.8 for case subjects and from 8.5 ± 1.9 to 6.3 ± 2.4 for control subjects) and isoload F (from 6.6 ± 1.8 to 4.2 ± 1.8 for case subjects and from 8.9 ± 1.9 to 7.0 ± 1.8 for control subjects). Although the single daily session was less expensive, the outpatient PRP total costs were greater because of the higher number of sessions and the cost of daily transportation.

Conclusions: In patients with CAO, a shorter inpatient PRP may result in improvement in exercise tolerance similar to a longer outpatient PRP but with lower costs. Whether a shorter outpatient PRP may get physiologic and clinical benefits, while further reducing costs, must be evaluated by future controlled, randomized, prospective studies.

Key Words: bronchial asthma • COPD • dyspnea • exercise training




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
A. L. Ries, G. S. Bauldoff, B. W. Carlin, R. Casaburi, C. F. Emery, D. A. Mahler, B. Make, C. L. Rochester, R. ZuWallack, and C. Herrerias
Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Joint ACCP/AACVPR Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest, May 1, 2007; 131(5_suppl): 4S - 42S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
R ZuWallack, A Hashim, C McCuskerl, E Nonnandin, M L Benoit-Connors, and B Lahiri
The trajectory of change over multiple outcome areas during comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation
Chronic Respiratory Disease, January 1, 2006; 3(1): 11 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
E M Clini and M Romagnoli
Inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation: does it make sense?
Chronic Respiratory Disease, January 1, 2005; 2(1): 43 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Rossi, F. Florini, M. Romagnoli, T. Bellantone, S. Lucic, D. Lugli, and E. Clini
Length and Clinical Effectiveness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Outpatients With Chronic Airway Obstruction
Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 105 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Chest Physicians.