Chest Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Normandin, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by ZuWallack, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Normandin, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by ZuWallack, R. L.
(Chest. 2002;121:1085-1091.)
© 2002 American College of Chest Physicians

An Evaluation of Two Approaches to Exercise Conditioning in Pulmonary Rehabilitation*

Edgar A. Normandin, PhD; Corliss McCusker, RN; MaryLou Connors, RN; Frederick Vale, RRT; Daniel Gerardi, MD, FCCP and Richard L. ZuWallack, MD, FCCP

* From the Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, CT.

Correspondence to: Edgar Normandin, PhD, Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, 114 Woodland St, Hartford, CT 06105; e-mail: rzuwalla{at}stfranciscare.org

Study objectives: To compare the effectiveness of two forms of exercise training in pulmonary rehabilitation.

Design: A prospective, randomized, unblinded, 8-week trial.

Setting: A hospital-based outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program.

Patients: Forty patients (20 patients in each group) with COPD who were referred for pulmonary rehabilitation.

Interventions: We compared the short-term effectiveness of a high-intensity, lower-extremity endurance program with a low-intensity, multicomponent calisthenics program for the rehabilitation of patients with COPD. The high-intensity group trained predominately on the stationary bicycle and treadmill, with a goal of exercising at >= 80% of maximal level determined from incremental testing for 30 min per session. The low-intensity group performed predominately classroom exercises for approximately 30 min per session. For both groups, twice-weekly sessions were held for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was health status, measured using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire. Other outcomes included peak oxygen consumption on incremental treadmill exercise testing, exertional dyspnea, treadmill endurance time, the number of sit-to-stand repetitions and arm lifts in 1 min, overall dyspnea, and questionnaire-rated functional status.

Measurements and results: Both groups showed significant postrehabilitation improvement in exercise variables, exertional and overall dyspnea, functional performance, and health status. Patients in the high-intensity group showed greater increases in treadmill endurance and greater reductions in exertional dyspnea, whereas those in the low-intensity group showed greater increases in arm-endurance testing. Both groups had similar improvements in overall dyspnea, functional performance, and health status.

Conclusions: Despite differences in exercise performance, both high-intensity, lower-extremity endurance training and low-intensity calisthenics led to similar short-term improvements in questionnaire-rated dyspnea, functional performance, and health status.

Key Words: COPD • dyspnea • exercise • functional performance • health status • pulmonary rehabilitation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
V. S. Probst, T. Troosters, F. Pitta, M. Decramer, and R. Gosselink
Cardiopulmonary stress during exercise training in patients with COPD
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1110 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
R ZuWallack, A Hashim, C McCuskerl, E Nonnandin, M L Benoit-Connors, and B Lahiri
The trajectory of change over multiple outcome areas during comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation
Chronic Respiratory Disease, January 1, 2006; 3(1): 11 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Verrill, C. Barton, W. Beasley, and W. M. Lippard
The Effects of Short-term and Long-term Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Functional Capacity, Perceived Dyspnea, and Quality of Life
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 673 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
T. Troosters, R. Casaburi, R. Gosselink, and M. Decramer
Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2005; 172(1): 19 - 38.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M D L Morgan
Peripheral muscle training in COPD: still much to learn
Thorax, May 1, 2005; 60(5): 359 - 360.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M A Puhan, H J Schunemann, M Frey, M Scharplatz, and L M Bachmann
How should COPD patients exercise during respiratory rehabilitation? Comparison of exercise modalities and intensities to treat skeletal muscle dysfunction
Thorax, May 1, 2005; 60(5): 367 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Chest Physicians.