Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Pachon, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Pachon, E.
(Chest. 2002;122:651-655.)
© 2002 American College of Chest Physicians

Paradoxical Movement of the Lateral Rib Margin (Hoover Sign) for Detecting Obstructive Airway Disease*

Eduardo Garcia-Pachon, MD

* From the Section of Pneumology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vega Baja, Orihuela-Alicante, Spain.

Correspondence to: Eduardo Garcia-Pachon, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Vega Baja, E-03314 Orihuela-Alicante, Spain; e-mail: egpachon{at}hotmail.com

Study objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Hoover sign for detecting obstructive airway disease (OAD), compared with wheezes, rhonchi, reduced breath sounds, and clinical impression, and to analyze the observer agreement on these signs.

Design: Prospective, blind comparison, with a reference standard (spirometry) among a consecutive series of patients.

Setting: Outpatient pulmonary clinic.

Patients: One hundred seventy-two patients (117 men [68%] and 55 women [32%]), who were > 40 years of age, had not been known previously by the participating physicians, and met at least one of the following criteria: smokers of > 20 pack-years; patients who had received a diagnosis of or had self-reported COPD (or chronic bronchitis or emphysema); patients who had received inhaler bronchodilator treatment for > 6 months; or patients with any degree of dyspnea.

Measurements: Patients were examined by a first-year resident in family medicine and by a pulmonologist. Spirometry was performed by a blinded trained technician. OAD was defined as an FEV1/FVC ratio of < 0.70.

Results: OAD was present in 64 patients (37%). Observer agreement ({kappa} statistic) was 0.74 for Hoover sign and was lower for the rest of the signs. Hoover sign had a sensitivity of 58% and a specificity of 86% for detecting OAD, and it had a positive likelihood ratio of 4.16, which was higher than that of the other signs.

Conclusions: Hoover sign, a frequently forgotten sign, is easy to recognize and is useful for detecting OAD.

Key Words: chest wall movement • COPD • Hoover sign • observer agreement • obstructive airway disease • physical examination






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Chest Physicians.