|
|
||||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Division of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Correspondence to: Allan L. Coates, MD CM, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G IX8; e-mail: allan.coates{at}sickkids.ca
Objectives: This randomized, double-blind, cross-over study evaluated the risk of bronchoconstriction with two preparations of inhaled tobramycin in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa with and without airway hyperreactivity.
Design: Of 19 children with CF (age range, 7 to 16 years) with mild-to-moderate pulmonary disease, 10 children were at high risk (HR) for bronchospasm (family history of asthma and previous response to bronchodilators) and 9 children were at low risk (LR) for bronchospasm (no family history of asthma or previous response to bronchodilators). Two solutions of tobramycin were administered: (1) 80 mg in a 2-mL vial diluted with 2 mL of saline solution containing the preservatives phenol and bisulfites (IV preparation); and (2) 300 mg in a preservative-free preparation in a 5-mL solution. Following a bronchodilator-free period of 12 h, the patients inhaled either one or the other preparation in random order on two different occasions, 2 weeks apart.
Results: Prechallenge and postchallenge results for the LR group showed a percentage of fall in FEV1 (
FEV1) of 12 ± 9% (mean ± SD) for the IV preparation, compared to 4 ± 5% for the preservative-free preparation (p = 0.046). An
FEV1 of > 10% was seen in six of nine patients for the IV preparation and in one of nine patients for preservative-free preparation. For the HR group, the
FEV1 was 17 ± 13% for the IV-preparation group, compared to 16 ± 12% for the preservative-free group (p = 0.4). In this group, equal numbers of patients (8 of 10 patients) had an
FEV1 > 10% after inhaling each preparation. The largest
FEV1 was 44% (HR group with the preservative-free preparation that forced the early termination of inhalation).
Conclusions: Both preparations caused significant bronchoconstriction in the HR group, and the preservative-containing IV preparation caused more bronchospasm in LR group than the preservative-free solution. Heightened airway reactivity in children with CF places them at risk of bronchospasm from inhalation therapy.
Key Words: bronchial constriction bronchospasm cystic fibrosis inhaled antibiotics tobramycin
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. A. Flume, C. Strange, X. Ye, M. Ebeling, T. Hulsey, and L. L. Clark Pneumothorax in Cystic Fibrosis Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 720 - 728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Alothman, B. Ho, M. M. Alsaadi, S. L. Ho, L. O'Drowsky, E. Louca, and A. L. Coates Bronchial Constriction and Inhaled Colistin in Cystic Fibrosis Chest, February 1, 2005; 127(2): 522 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S P Conway Nebulized antibiotic therapy: the evidence Chronic Respiratory Disease, January 1, 2005; 2(1): 35 - 41. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |