HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My Personal Article Archive Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Golpe, R. Articles by Carpizo, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Golpe, R. Articles by Carpizo, R.

Home Sleep Studies in the Assessment of Sleep Apnea/Hypopnea Syndrome^*

^* From the Sleep Disorders Unit, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain.

Correspondence to: Rafael Golpe, MD, Rúa do Ensino 1-3 D, 32002 Orense, Spain; e-mail: rafa898{at}separ.es

Objective: To determine the clinical utility of a limited sleep-recording device used unsupervised in the patient’s home, compared with in-laboratory, fully supervised polysomnography for the diagnosis of sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (SAHS), and to assess its impact on costs.

Design: Prospective case study.

Setting: The sleep-disorders unit of a tertiary referral university hospital.

Patients: Fifty-five patients suspected of having SAHS and living within 30 km of our laboratory.

Methods: Patients were studied first in their homes with the limited sleep-recording device. Polysomnography was performed within 30 days of the first study. Both studies were read by independent investigators blinded to the results of the other study. Diagnoses and therapeutic decisions regarding the use of continuous positive airway pressure obtained from the home and laboratory studies were compared. Agreement between the home and laboratory study recordings was also assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Bland-Altman analysis. One half of the home studies were randomly assigned to be performed with a sleep technician’s set up of the equipment in the patient’s home (group 1), and the other half with the patient’s own setup of the sleep-recording device (group 2), after an instruction period in the hospital. An economic analysis was performed, considering the cost of repeating studies in cases with faulty or inconclusive home studies (these patients should undergo polysomnography as a second step).

Results: Seven percent of the home studies in group 1, and 33% in group 2 produced no interpretable data because of artifacts (p < 0.05). Sixteen percent of the home study findings were inconclusive. The diagnosis obtained from the limited sleep-recording device and polysomnography agreed in 75% of the interpretable home studies (89%, if inconclusive home studies were excluded). The area under the ROC curve for the home study-derived parameters was between 0.84 and 0.89, compared with polysomnography. There was no bias between home and polysomnography studies in the Bland-Altman plot. The cost per study of home study recordings was less expensive than that of polysomnography (143.86 euros), either with (93.08 euros) or without (129.97 euros) intervention of the technician in the patient’s home.

Conclusion: Home sleep studies are a viable form of diagnosing SAHS, and are less expensive than polysomnography. Intervention of a sleep technician in the patient’s home was the least expensive strategy, because of the high percentages of faulty studies with the patient’s own setup of the equipment, when using the limited sleep-recording device.

Key Words: home sleep study • limited sleep-recording device • polysomnography • sleep apnea syndromes

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Garcia-Diaz, E. Quintana-Gallego, A. Ruiz, C. Carmona-Bernal, A. Sanchez-Armengol, G. Botebol-Benhamou, and F. Capote Respiratory Polygraphy With Actigraphy in the Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome Chest, March 1, 2007; 131(3): 725 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Quintana-Gallego, M. Villa-Gil, C. Carmona-Bernal, G. Botebol-Benhamou, A. Martinez-Martinez, A. Sanchez-Armengol, J. Polo-Padillo, and F. Capote Home respiratory polygraphy for diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2004; 24(3): 443 - 448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. P. Poels, A. G. M. Schilder, S. van den Berg, A. W. Hoes, and K. F. M. Joosten Evaluation of a New Device for Home Cardiorespiratory Recording in Children Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, December 1, 2003; 129(12): 1281 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]