Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, S. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, S. P.
(Chest. 2002;122:2096-2104.)
© 2002 American College of Chest Physicians

Effects of Inspiratory Flow Waveforms on Lung Mechanics, Gas Exchange, and Respiratory Metabolism in COPD Patients During Mechanical Ventilation*

Shieh Ching Yang, MD, FCCP and Sze Piao Yang, MD, FCCP

* From the Pulmonary Function Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Correspondence to: Shieh Ching Yang, MD, FCCP, Department of Laboratory Medicine, 2F, 21, Alley 2, Lane 65, Section 2, Chung-Shan N Rd, Taipei, Taiwan

Study objective: The clinical usefulness of varying inspiratory flow waveforms during mechanical ventilation has not been adequately studied. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three different respiratory waveforms on the pulmonary mechanics, gas exchange, and respiratory metabolism of ventilated patients with COPD.

Design: A randomized and comparative trial of consecutive patients.

Setting: Medical ICUs of a 2,000-bed university hospital.

Patients: Fifty-four patients with COPD were enrolled.

Interventions: Constant, decelerating, and sine waveforms were applied to each patient in a random order.

Measurements and results: With tidal volume, inspiratory time, and inspiratory frequency being kept constant, the decelerating waveform produced statistically significant reductions of peak inspiratory pressure, mean airway resistance, physiologic dead space ventilation (VD/VT), PaCO2, and symptom score. There was also a significant increase in alveolar-arterial oxygen pressure difference with the decelerating flow waveform, but there were no significant changes in mean airway pressure, arterial oxygenation, heart rate, mean BP, and other hemodynamic measurements. In addition, assessment on the work of breathing (WOB) revealed that ventilator WOB values were reduced with the decelerating waveform. Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide output were virtually not affected by changing inspiratory flow waveforms. Except for VD/VT, the effects of constant square and sine waveforms were similar to each other and could not be separated statistically.

Conclusions: The most favorable flow pattern for ventilated patients with COPD appeared to be the decelerating waveform. There are possibilities for the improvement of ventilation in these patients by selecting an appropriate inspiratory flow.

Key Words: COPD • gas exchange • inspiratory flow waveforms • mechanical ventilation • oxygen consumption • pulmonary mechanics • work of breathing




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
G Ntoumenopoulos
Indications for manual lung hyperinflation (MHI) in the mechanically ventilated patient with chronic obstructivepulmonary disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease, October 1, 2005; 2(4): 199 - 207.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Chest Physicians.