| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
|
|
|
|||||||
Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password |
|||||||||
* From the Centre de recherche de l’Hôpital Laval, Institut de cardiologie et de pneumologie de l’Université Laval, Sainte-Foy (Québec), Canada.
Correspondence to: Louis-Philippe Boulet, MD, FCCP, Institut de cardiologie et de pneumologie de l’Université Laval, 2725, chemin Sainte-Foy, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada; e-mail: lpboulet{at}med.ulaval.ca
Abstract
Background: Current asthma guidelines suggest a series of criteria to assess if asthma is controlled. However, there is a need to develop a simple and practical method to quantify the degree of such control, both in clinical practice and research.
Study objectives: This report describes a new method to quantify asthma control based on a percentage score. It also aims at comparing the percentage scores obtained with patient’s self-evaluation of asthma control and a current validated Mini Asthma Quality of Life (MAQOL) questionnaire.
Setting and subjects: Forty-two subjects (25 female and 17 male patients) with asthma of different severity recruited from a tertiary center asthma clinic.
Methods: The asthma scoring method provided a percentage control for symptoms, baseline expiratory flows and, an optional parameter, for airway inflammation assessed from induced-sputum eosinophil count. These control parameters were compared to an overall assessment of asthma control by the patient (also on a 100% scale) and the score obtained from a validated MAQOL questionnaire.
Results: Mean ± SEM scores for symptoms, expiratory flows, and airway eosinophilia (last 2 weeks) were 87.8 ± 1.4%, 88.6 ± 1.8%, and 66.2 ± 3.9%, respectively. No significant correlation was found between these three parameters (p > 0.05). The mean global asthma control score and the score estimated by the patient were 80.9 ± 1.5% and 91.7 ± 1.5%, respectively (not significantly different). There was a significant correlation between asthma control score (percentage) and percentage symptom score (p < 0.001), while it almost achieved significance for FEV1 (p = 0.05). Only symptom scores correlated with the MAQOL questionnaire.
Conclusions: We developed a simple easy-to-use asthma control scoring system based on a percentage of optimal control. The percentage symptom score but not the global control score of this new method correlated with patient’s global assessment of asthma control. This could be a simple tool that is potentially useful both for the clinician and for research purposes, to quantify global or specific aspects of asthma control.
Key Words: asthma control • asthma treatment
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. A. Mancuso, S. Wenderoth, H. Westermann, T. N. Choi, W. M. Briggs, and M. E. Charlson Patient-Reported and Physician-Reported Depressive Conditions in Relation to Asthma Severity and Control Chest, May 1, 2008; 133(5): 1142 - 1148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. P. Yawn, S. K. Brenneman, F. C. Allen-Ramey, M. D. Cabana, and L. E. Markson Assessment of Asthma Severity and Asthma Control in Children Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 118(1): 322 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Graham Classifying Asthma Chest, July 1, 2006; 130(1_suppl): 13S - 20S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.-P. Boulet, C. Lemiere, F. Archambault, G. Carrier, M. C. Descary, and F. Deschesnes Smoking and Asthma: Clinical and Radiologic Features, Lung Function, and Airway Inflammation Chest, March 1, 2006; 129(3): 661 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
