Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Light, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Light, R. W.
(Chest. 2003;123:418-423.)
© 2003 American College of Chest Physicians

Ultrasound-Guided Thoracentesis*

Is It a Safer Method?

Phillip W. Jones, DMD, MD; J. Phillip Moyers, MD; Jeffrey T. Rogers, RRT; R. Michael Rodriguez, MD; Y. C. Gary Lee, MB ChB and Richard W. Light, MD, FCCP

* From the Departments of Medicine (Drs. Light and Rodriguez) and Radiology (Dr. Moyers and Mr. Rogers), Saint Thomas Hospital, and Vanderbilt University (Drs. Jones and Lee), Nashville, TN.

Correspondence to: Richard W. Light, MD, FCCP, Director of Pulmonary Disease Program, Saint Thomas Hospital, 4220 Harding Rd, Nashville, TN 37205; e-mail: RLIGHT98{at}yahoo.com

Study objectives: The objectives of this study are as follows: (1) to determine the incidence of complications from thoracentesis performed under ultrasound guidance by interventional radiologists in a tertiary referral teaching hospital; (2) to evaluate the incidence of vasovagal events without the use of atropine prior to thoracentesis; and (3) to evaluate patient or radiographic factors that may contribute to, or be predictive of, the development of re-expansion pulmonary edema after ultrasound-guided thoracentesis.

Design: Prospective descriptive study.

Setting: Saint Thomas Hospital, a tertiary referral teaching hospital in Nashville, TN.

Patients: All patients referred to interventional radiology for diagnostic and/or therapeutic ultrasound-guided thoracentesis between August 1997 and September 2000.

Results: A total of 941 thoracenteses in 605 patients were performed during the study period. The following complications were recorded: pain (n = 25; 2.7%), pneumothorax (n = 24; 2.5%), shortness of breath (n = 9; 1.0%), cough (n = 8; 0.8%), vasovagal reaction (n = 6; 0.6%), bleeding (n = 2; 0.2%), hematoma (n = 2; 0.2%), and re-expansion pulmonary edema (n = 2; 0.2%). Eight patients with pneumothorax received tube thoracostomies (0.8%). When > 1,100 mL of fluid were removed, the incidence of pneumothorax requiring tube thoracostomy and pain was increased (p < 0.05). Fifty-seven percent of patients with shortness of breath during the procedure were noted to have pneumothorax on postprocedure radiographs, while 16% of patients with pain were noted to have pneumothorax on postprocedure radiographs. Vasovagal reactions occurred in 0.6% despite no administration of prophylactic atropine. Re-expansion pulmonary edema complicated 2 of 373 thoracenteses (0.5%) in which > 1,000 mL of pleural fluid were removed.

Conclusions: The complication rate with thoracentesis performed by interventional radiologists under ultrasound guidance is lower than that reported for non–image-guided thoracentesis. Premedication with atropine is unnecessary given the low incidence of vasovagal reactions. Re-expansion pulmonary edema is uncommon even when > 1,000 mL of pleural fluid are removed, as long as the procedure is stopped when symptoms develop.

Key Words: pleural effusion • pneumothorax • re-expansion pulmonary edema • thoracentesis • ultrasound




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Heidecker, J. T. Huggins, S. A. Sahn, and P. Doelken
Pathophysiology of pneumothorax following ultrasound-guided thoracentesis.
Chest, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 1173 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Feller-Kopman
Ultrasound-Guided Thoracentesis
Chest, June 1, 2006; 129(6): 1709 - 1714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Gegenhuber, T. Mueller, B. Dieplinger, K. Lenz, W. Poelz, and M. Haltmayers
Plasma B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Patients With Pleural Effusions: Preliminary Observations
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 1003 - 1009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C.-Y. Tu, W.-H. Hsu, T.-C. Hsia, H.-J. Chen, K.-D. Tsai, C.-W. Hung, and C.-M. Shih
Pleural Effusions in Febrile Medical ICU Patients: Chest Ultrasound Study
Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1274 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. H. Mayo, H. R. Goltz, M. Tafreshi, and P. Doelken
Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Thoracentesis in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation
Chest, March 1, 2004; 125(3): 1059 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Is Ultrasound-Guided Thoracentesis Safer?
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, April 15, 2003; 2003(415): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Chest Physicians.