Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moss, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cotsonis, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moss, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cotsonis, G. A.
(Chest. 2003;123:923-928.)
© 2003 American College of Chest Physicians

An Appraisal of Multivariable Logistic Models in the Pulmonary and Critical Care Literature*

Marc Moss, MD; D. Andrew Wellman, MD and George A. Cotsonis, MA

* From the Department of Medicine (Drs. Moss and Wellman), Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, and the Rollins School of Public Health (Mr. Cotsonis), Emory Unversity, Atlanta, GA.

Correspondence to: Marc Moss, MD, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Grady Memorial Hospital, 69 Jesse Hill Junior Dr, Suite 2C007, Atlanta, GA 30335; e-mail: marc_moss{at}emory.org

Objective: Multivariable modeling techniques are appearing in today’s medical literature with increasing frequency. Improper reporting of these statistical models can potentially make the results of a study inaccurate, misleading, or difficult to interpret. We performed a manual literature search of five international pulmonary and critical care journals to determine the accuracy in the reporting of logistic regression modeling strategies.

Design: We examined all of the published manuscripts for 12 potential limitations in the reporting of important statistical methodologies over a 6-month period from July 1, 2000, until December 31, 2000.

Results: Of the 81 articles that included multivariable logistic regression analyses, only 65% (53 analyses) properly reported the coding classification of pertinent independent variables that were included in the final model. An odds ratio and confidence interval were reported for the independent variables included in the final model for 79% (64 analyses) and 74% (60 analyses), respectively. Only 12% (10 articles) referenced whether interaction terms or effect modifications were examined, 1% (1 article) reported testing for collinearity, and only 16% (13 articles) included a goodness-of-fit analysis of the logistic model. The type of statistical package was reported in 69% (56 articles). Finally, approximately 39% of the articles (22 of 57) may have overfit the logistic regression model, leading to potentially unreliable regression coefficients and odds ratios.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that the reporting of multivariable logistic regression analyses in the pulmonary and critical care literature is often incomplete, therefore making it difficult for the reader to accurately interpret the manuscript. We recommend the implementation of adequate guidelines that will lead to overall improvements in the reporting and possibly to the conducting of multivariable analyses in the pulmonary medicine and critical care medicine literature.

Key Words: critical care medicine • logistic models • pulmonary medicine • study design




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
A. X. Freire, L. Bridges, G. E. Umpierrez, D. Kuhl, and A. E. Kitabchi
Admission Hyperglycemia and Other Risk Factors as Predictors of Hospital Mortality in a Medical ICU Population
Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5): 3109 - 3116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. N. Wijeysundera, W. S. Beattie, G. Djaiani, V. Rao, M. A. Borger, K. Karkouti, and R. J. Cusimano
Off-Pump Coronary Artery Surgery for Reducing Mortality and Morbidity: Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 6, 2005; 46(5): 872 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Joffe, J. Barr, and M. K. Gould
Pitfalls in the Interpretation of Multivariable Models in the Critical Care Literature
Chest, January 1, 2005; 127(1): 411 - 412.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. V. Hernandez, Y. Vergouwe, E. W. Steyerberg, and M. Moss
Reporting of Predictive Logistic Models Should Be Based on Evidence-Based Guidelines
Chest, November 1, 2003; 124(5): 2034 - 2035.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. D. Barnett
Increasing Statistical Accuracy
Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 771 - 771.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Chest Physicians.