Chest ACCP Member Benefits
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krivopal, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartzstein, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krivopal, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartzstein, R. M.
(Chest. 2003;123:1607-1614.)
© 2003 American College of Chest Physicians

Utility of Daily Routine Portable Chest Radiographs in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Medical ICU*

Mark Krivopal, MD; Oksana A. Shlobin, MD and Richard M. Schwartzstein, MD, FCCP

* From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Correspondence to: Richard M. Schwartzstein, MD, FCCP, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail: rschwart{at}caregroup.harvard.edu

Study objectives: To determine whether there is any difference in diagnostic, therapeutic, and outcome efficacy between protocols utilizing daily (ie, routine) chest radiographs (CXRs) and those utilizing clinically indicated (ie, nonroutine) CXRs in mechanically ventilated patients.

Design: Prospective, randomized, observational study.

Setting: A 20-bed medical ICU at a university hospital.

Patients: Adult patients who had been receiving mechanical ventilation for > 48 h.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and results: Ninety-four patients who had been intubated for at least 48 h were randomized to receive either routine or nonroutine CXRs and were observed until extubation or death. The percentage of CXRs with new findings was significantly larger in the nonroutine CXR group (53.1%; 120 CXRs) compared to that in the routine CXR group (33.4%; 98 CXRs; odds ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 2.18; p = 0.004). The number of CXRs with new findings that resulted in interventions was significantly larger in the nonroutine CXR group (26.5%; 60 CXRs) compared to that in the routine CXR group (13.3%; 39 CXRs; OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.29 to 3.08; p = 0.002). There was no difference in the mean duration of mechanical ventilation (routine CXR arm, 7.93 days; nonroutine CXR arm, 6.76 days; p = 0.2606), length of ICU stay (routine CXR arm, 11.93 days; nonroutine CXR arm, 9.55 days; p = 0.1936), and total length of hospital stay (routine CXR arm, 19.34 days; nonroutine CXR arm, 16.45 days; p = 0.2199) between the two groups. Although patients in the nonroutine arm of the study received fewer CXRs, adverse outcomes (eg, length of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, and mortality) did not increase (p = 0.818). Using the number of CXRs per patient as a surrogate, there was a statistically significant cost savings and decreased radiation exposure in the nonroutine CXR group.

Conclusions: For mechanically ventilated patients, a strategy calling for daily routine CXRs compared to CXRs obtained based on clinical indications alone was not associated with reduced ICU or hospital length of stay or with reduced mortality.

Key Words: chest radiograph • ICU • intubation • mechanical ventilation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
K.-D. Lessnau
From Delphi to Knowledge and Comfort: The Devil Is in the Details
Chest, May 1, 2008; 133(5): 1060 - 1062.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Hejblum, V. Ioos, J.-F. Vibert, P.-Y. Boelle, L. Chalumeau-Lemoine, C. Chouaid, A.-J. Valleron, and B. Guidet
A Web-Based Delphi Study on the Indications of Chest Radiographs for Patients in ICUs
Chest, May 1, 2008; 133(5): 1107 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
K. A. Hendrikse, J. W. C. Gratama, W. ten Hove, J. H. Rommes, M. J. Schultz, and P. E. Spronk
Low Value of Routine Chest Radiographs in a Mixed Medical-Surgical ICU
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3): 823 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Intensive Care MedHome page
M. E. Graat, J. Stoker, M. B. Vroom, and M. J. Schultz
Can We Abandon Daily Routine Chest Radiography in Intensive Care Patients?
J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2005; 20(4): 238 - 246.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. J. Schultz, M. L. Janower, R. M. Schwartzstein, and M. Krivopal
Daily Routine Chest Radiographs
Chest, March 1, 2004; 125(3): 1167 - 1167.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Are Daily Chest X-Rays Necessary in the ICU?
Journal Watch (General), May 23, 2003; 2003(523): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Chest Physicians.