Chest ACCP Education Calendar
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Guest Access | Sign In via User Name/Password
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Article Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smina, M.
Right arrow Articles by Manthous, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smina, M.
Right arrow Articles by Manthous, C. A.
(Chest. 2003;124:262-268.)
© 2003 American College of Chest Physicians

Cough Peak Flows and Extubation Outcomes*

Mihai Smina, MD; Adil Salam, MD; Mohammad Khamiees, MD; Pritee Gada, MD; Yaw Amoateng-Adjepong, MD, PhD and Constantine A. Manthous, MD, FCCP

* From Pulmonary and Critical Care, Bridgeport Hospital and Yale University School of Medicine, Bridgeport, CT.

Correspondence to: Constantine A. Manthous, MD, FCCP, Bridgeport Hospital, 267 Grant St, Bridgeport, CT 06610; e-mail: pcmant{at}bpthosp.org

Background: Semiobjective methods of quantifying cough strength and endotracheal secretions have been demonstrated to predict extubation outcomes of patients who have passed a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT).

Hypothesis: Cough strength, measured by voluntary cough peak expiratory flow (PEF), and endotracheal secretions, measured volumetrically, predict extubation outcomes of patients who have passed an SBT.

Patient population: Critically ill patients admitted to the medical ICU of a 300-bed community teaching hospital.

Methods: All patients who passed an SBT and were about to be extubated were studied. The best of three cough attempts, measured with an in-line spirometer, and the average hourly rate of suctioned secretions prior to extubation were recorded with other weaning parameters and demographic data.

Results: Ninety-five patients were studied before and after 115 extubations. There were 13 unsuccessful extubations. There were no differences in age, gender, duration of intubation, or APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II scores between successful and unsuccessful extubations. The magnitude of endotracheal secretions was not associated with outcomes. The PEF of patients with unsuccessful extubations was significantly lower than that of those with successful extubations (64.2 ± 6.8 L/min vs 81.9 ± 2.7 L/min, p = 0.03). Patients with unsuccessful extubations stayed longer in the ICU than those with successful extubations (11.7 ± 2.1 days vs 5.3 ± 0.4 days, p = 0.009). Those with PEF <= 60 L/min were five times as likely to have unsuccessful extubations and were 19 times as likely to die on that hospital stay. PEF and the rapid shallow breathing index were independently associated with extubation outcomes, while only the PEF (<= 60 L/min) was independently associated with in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion: These data suggest that cough strength, measured objectively, is a predictor of extubation outcome, morbidity, and mortality.

Key Words: extubation • mechanical ventilation • mortality • outcomes • weaning




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. Ferrer, M. Valencia, J. M. Nicolas, O. Bernadich, J. R. Badia, and A. Torres
Early Noninvasive Ventilation Averts Extubation Failure in Patients at Risk: A Randomized Trial
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2006; 173(2): 164 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Chest Physicians.